Cited by 590Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Measuring sleep quality

Krystal, Andrew D., Edinger, Jack D.·2008·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Despite being used commonly in sleep medicine, the term "sleep quality" has not been rigorously defined. The purpose of this article is to consider objective measures of the subjective "sleep quality" experience. In order to do so, it was necessary to choose a definition of "sleep quality" as a basis for discussion. We have chosen to employ the simple Likert-style rating of (the previous night's) sleep quality, commonly included as an item on sleep diaries, as the core sleep quality indicator and focus of this article. The potential objective measures discussed include polysomnography, cyclic alternating pattern and actigraphy. We review the strengths and weaknesses of these measures as well as discuss challenges facing the development of an objective correlate of "sleep quality" ratings, including that such ratings may reflect non-sleep phenomena such as mood or health status and the possibility that "sleep quality" may reflect different aspects of sleep among people. We also discuss new approaches intended to address these challenges, including: (1) combining different types of measures; (2) sub-grouping individuals based on clinical or physiological characteristics and developing different measures in these subgroups; and (3) sub-grouping based on the association of potential measures and quality ratings over nights.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1389-9457(08)70011-x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subjective sleep measures may capture experiential aspects of sleep quality, such as fatigue and daytime sleepiness, that are more proximally related to learning and school functioning than objective indicators alone.

    “This pattern is consistent with prior research suggesting that subjective sleep measures may capture experiential aspects of sleep quality (e.g., fatigue, daytime sleepiness) that are more proximally related to learning and school functioning than objective indicators alone (Adelantado-Renau et al., 2019a; Krystal & Edinger, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krystal, A. D., & Edinger, J. D.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Krystal, Andrew D.
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
9
Pages
S10-S17
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024919601
Cited by
590
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Sanofi
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL073259, R01-HL-073259-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
sleep quality, sleep diary, Likert scale, polysomnography, cyclic alternating pattern, actigraphy, subgroup analysis
MeSH terms
Electroencephalography, Humans, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Sleep, REM, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review