The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Rates in Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate Students
Open accessAbstract
Background: In educational research, online survey has become one of the most popular methods of data collection. Academic researchers, including faculty and students, expect and require a good response rate to their research projects for reliable results. Purpose: In this paper, the authors examine a wide range of factors related to survey response rates in academic research. Examples include email checking habits, survey design, and attitudes toward research. Setting: An online survey environment Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: A cross-sectional quantitative research method was used to analyze the factors that influence participants’ email survey response rate. Data were collected at a single point in time. The authors did not directly measure changes that come over time in this study. Data Collection and Analysis: After receiving the Institutional Research Board’s approval, the researchers distributed the survey via the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Graduate Student Discussion List subscribers. A sample of 454 responses was used in the final analysis-- with a 78.9 % response rate. The authors used descriptive statistics (percentage, average mean) and inferential statistics (chi-square and correlations) to report the data analysis and findings. Findings: Results indicated that research survey response rate was highly influenced by interests of participants, survey structure, communication methods, and assurance of privacy and confidentiality. The findings also suggested that male participants were more likely to respond to surveys if they received a reminder, and older participants were more likely to respond if they were promised a reward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determining sample size for research activities
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447003000308 · Cited by 18,930
Educational Research: An Introduction
Dale, R. R., & Borg, W. R. (1965) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119062 · Cited by 7,198
Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2007) · Cited by 6,278
Educational Research: An Introduction
Bennett, N., Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1984) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121583 · Cited by 5,595
A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates
Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfh006 · Cited by 1,661
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review
Fan, W., & Yan, Z. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015 · Cited by 1,521
E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review
Sheehan, K. B. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,441
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Shih, T.-H., & Fan, X. (2008) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x08317085 · Cited by 1,159
Educational research an introduction
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (n.d.) · Cited by 1,070
Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey
Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269338 · Cited by 810
Cited by
Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis
Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K., & Fils-Aime, F. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206 · Cited by 1,135
Parenting-Related Exhaustion during the Italian COVID-19 Lockdown
Marchetti, D., Fontanesi, L., Mazza, C., Di Giandomenico, S., Roma, P., & Verrocchio, M. C. (2020) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa093 · Cited by 300
The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on People with Parkinson’s Disease
Brown, E. G., Chahine, L. M., Goldman, S. M., Korell, M., Mann, E., Kinel, D. R., Arnedo, V., Marek, K. L., & Tanner, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Parkinson's Disease · doi:10.3233/jpd-202249 · Cited by 177
The Influence of Personality, Resilience, and Alexithymia on Mental Health During COVID-19 Pandemic
Osimo, S. A., Aiello, M., Gentili, C., Ionta, S., & Cecchetto, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630751 · Cited by 106
“This is an issue familiar to many studies based on an online survey (Salari et al., 2020) that has been previously reported (Smith, 2008; Saleh and Bista, 2017).”
BackgroundFontanesi, L., Marchetti, D., Limoncin, E., Rossi, R., Nimbi, F. M., Mollaioli, D., Sansone, A., Colonnello, E., Simonelli, C., Di Lorenzo, G., et al. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.100 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Saleh, A., & Bista, K.
- Venue
- Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
- Published
- 2017-09-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 63-74
- ISSN
- 1556-8180 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2759613974
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 68.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Rates in Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.56645/jmde.v13i29.487
- The paper
- Saleh, A., & Bista, K. (2017). Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Rates in Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate Students. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v13i29.487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.