Cited by 300COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFamily and Disability Support Research

Parenting-Related Exhaustion during the Italian COVID-19 Lockdown

Open access
Marchetti, Daniela, Fontanesi, Lilybeth, Mazza, Cristina, Di Giandomenico, Serena, Roma, Paolo, Verrocchio, Maria Cristina·2020·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Worldwide, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has generated significant worry, uncertainty, anxiety, sadness, and loneliness. In Italy, these effects have been particularly pronounced. While research on the COVID-19 outbreak has mainly focused on the clinical features of infected patients and the psychological impact on the general population and health professionals, no investigation has yet assessed the psychological impact of the pandemic on parents. In the present research, we conducted a web-based survey of Italian parents to examine the prevalence of parenting-related exhaustion-and to identify its associated risk and protective factors-4 weeks into the lockdown. METHODS: A total of 1,226 parents provided their consent to participate in the study and completed a demographic questionnaire, information relating to particular COVID-19 experiences, and measures of emotional exhaustion, parental resilience, social connections, and psychological distress during the lockdown. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of our sample experienced significant parenting-related exhaustion, with mothers more severely affected. Multiple regression analyses showed that greater parenting-related exhaustion was predicted by psychological distress, lower parental resilience, motherhood, fewer perceived social connections, and being single, as well as having a child with special needs, having a large number of children, and having younger children. CONCLUSION: The findings add further support to the call for preventive programs to support parents throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental health professionals and social workers should be warned of the effects of lockdown and social distancing on parenting and, consequently, the well-being of children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa093

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being female is a relevant risk factor for the expression of negative emotions and worse mental conditions during the COVID-19 lockdown.

    “The literature regarding gender, for instance, consistently indicated being female as a relevant risk factor for the expression of negative emotions and worse mental conditions during the COVID-19 lockdown [1]”

    From The Role of Pre-Pandemic Mental Health Status and Personality Traits on Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Lockdown among Italian Young Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Discussion reports that mothers had significantly higher psychological distress than fathers during lockdown, supporting a gender difference in mental health. The study concerns Italian parents of children aged 0–13, however, so it does not establish the claim for women generally; it also does not separately report a gender difference in the expression of negative emotions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Crnic, K., & Low, C. (2002). Everyday stresses and parent- ing. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Practical issues in parenting (pp. 243-267).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marchetti, D., Fontanesi, L., Mazza, C., Di Giandomenico, S., Roma, P., & Verrocchio, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Fontanesi, Lilybeth
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2020-10-17
Volume
45
Issue
10
Pages
1114-1123
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W3093369882
Cited by
300
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 9
FWCI
24.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
COVID-19 lockdown, parental resilience, social connectedness, motherhood, single parents, children with special needs, risk and protective factors, Italian parents
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Burnout, Psychological, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Parents, Pneumonia, Viral, Quarantine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Parenting, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review