Cited by 71Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchRespiratory Support and MechanismsNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

The Performance of Two Automatic Servo-Ventilation Devices in the Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea

Open access
Javaheri, Shahrokh, Goetting, Mark G., Khayat, Rami, Wylie, Paul E., Goodwin, James L., Parthasarathy, Sairam·2011·Sleep

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic performance of a new auto Servo Ventilation device (Philips Respironics autoSV Advanced) for the treatment of complex central sleep apnea (CompSA). The features of autoSV Advanced include an automatic expiratory pressure (EPAP) adjustment, an advanced algorithm for distinguishing open versus obstructed airway apnea, a modified auto backup rate which is proportional to subject's baseline breathing rate, and a variable inspiratory support. Our primary aim was to compare the performance of the advanced servo-ventilator (BiPAP autoSV Advanced) with conventional servo-ventilator (BiPAP autoSV) in treating central sleep apnea (CSA). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Five sleep laboratories in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven participants were included. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: All subjects had full night polysomnography (PSG) followed by a second night continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration. All had a central apnea index ≥ 5 per hour of sleep on CPAP. Subjects were randomly assigned to 2 full-night PSGs while treated with either the previously marketed autoSV, or the new autoSV Advanced device. The 2 randomized sleep studies were blindly scored centrally. Across the 4 nights (PSG, CPAP, autoSV, and autoSV Advanced), the mean ± 1 SD apnea hypopnea indices were 53 ± 23, 35 ± 20, 10 ± 10, and 6 ± 6, respectively; indices for CSA were 16 ± 19, 19 ± 18, 3 ± 4, and 0.6 ± 1. AutoSV Advanced was more effective than other modes in correcting sleep related breathing disorders. CONCLUSIONS: BiPAP autoSV Advanced was more effective than conventional BiPAP autoSV in the treatment of sleep disordered breathing in patients with CSA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.1438

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Javaheri et al. compared two ASV devices available in 2011 in a mixed TECSA population and found greater AHI improvement with the BiPAP-Auto-advanced device.

    “Javaheri et al. compared two ASV devices available in 2011 (BiPAP-AutoSV advanced and BiPAP-AutoSV) in a mixed population of TECSA patients and found greater improvement in the AHI with the BiPAP-Auto-advanced device.1183”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1183]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Javaheri, S., Goetting, M. G., Khayat, R., Wylie, P. E., Goodwin, J. L., & Parthasarathy, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Javaheri, Shahrokh
Venue
Sleep
Published
2011-12
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
1693-1698
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2071221977
Cited by
71
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
central sleep apnea, bilevel positive airway pressure, apnea-hypopnea index, sleep-disordered breathing, CPAP titration, polysomnography
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Central, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Exhalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review