Cited by 52Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Wakefulness Research

A Combined Field and Laboratory Design for Assessing the Impact of Night Shift Work on Police Officer Operational Performance

Open access
Waggoner, Lauren B., Grant, Devon A., Van Dongen, Hans P. A., Belenky, Gregory, Vila, Bryan·2012·Sleep

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the utility of a combined field and laboratory research design for measuring the impact of consecutive night shift work on the sleepiness, vigilance, and driving performance of police patrol officers. DESIGN: For police patrol officers working their normal night shift duty cycles, simulated driving performance and psychomotor vigilance were measured in a laboratory on two separate occasions: in the morning after the last of five consecutive 10.7-h night shifts, and at the same time in the morning after three consecutive days off duty. Order of participation in conditions was randomized among subjects. SETTING: Subjects experienced manipulation of sleep schedules due to working night shifts in a real operational environment, but performance testing was conducted under controlled laboratory conditions. PARTICIPANTS: N = 29 active-duty police patrol officers (27 male, 2 female; age 37.1 ± 6.3 years) working night shift schedules participated in this study. RESULTS: Simulated driving performance, psychomotor vigilance, and subjective sleepiness were significantly degraded following 5 consecutive night shifts as compared to 3 consecutive days off duty, indicating that active-duty police officers are susceptible to performance degradation as a consequence of working nights. CONCLUSIONS: This combined field and laboratory research design succeeded in bridging the gap between the realism of the operational environment and the control of laboratory performance testing, demonstrating that this is a useful approach for addressing the relationship between shift work induced fatigue and critical operational task performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.2214

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waggoner, L. B., Grant, D. A., Van Dongen, H. P. A., Belenky, G., & Vila, B.
Affiliations
Washington State University Spokane (US)
Venue
Sleep
Published
2012-11
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
1575-1577
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2035393064
Cited by
52
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research
  • Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
night shift work, police officers, police patrol, simulated driving performance, psychomotor vigilance, sleepiness, sustained attention, operational performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Psychomotor Performance, United States, Wakefulness, Work Schedule Tolerance, Police, Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review