Cited by 92Obesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity and Health Practices

Perceived Barriers to Weight loss Programs for Overweight or Ob-ese Women

Open access
Sharifi, Nasrin, Mahdavi, Reza, Ebrahimi-Mameghani, Mehrangiz·2013·Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background In order to develop appropriate obesity control and treatment strategies, the key point is to understand the barriers perceived by overweight or obese people in trying to follow weight-loss programs. This study examined perceived barriers to weight-loss programs among overweight or obese women. Methods In this descriptive-analytical study, 204 overweight or obese women aged 31.97± 10.62 yr, were selected randomly from the nutritional counseling centers in 2008 in Tabriz, Iran. The mean BMI was 33.83 ±5.75 kg/ m2. A structured questionnaire including questions on barriers to weight-loss diet and physical activity was filled out for each participant by face-to-face interview. Height and weight measured objectively and demographic details were obtained. Data analysis carried out using multiple regression and factor analysis. Results The most important perceived barriers to weight-loss diets were 'situational barriers', stress, depression, and food craving. High educational level was independent determinant of situational barriers (β=0.329, P=0.048). Employee women had a higher mean score on stress and depression than students and housewives. Lack of time and exercising lonely were the most important items of "External barriers" and Lack of motivation was the most important item of "internal barriers" to physical activity. Employment and being student were highly associated with external barriers (β=1.018, P Conclusion Weight reducing strategies should take into accoun…

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5681/hpp.2013.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharifi, N., Mahdavi, R., & Ebrahimi-Mameghani, M.
Affiliations
  • Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Venue
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Publisher
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Published
2013
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
11-22
OpenAlex
W2122214574
Cited by
92
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
  • PubMed
Funders
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
barriers to weight loss, obesity, overweight women, weight loss diet, physical activity, situational barriers, stress, depression, food cravings, time constraints, lack of motivation, educational attainment, employment status, age

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review