Cited by 26Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsEducational Research and MethodsInnovations in Medical Education

An Exploration of Pharmacy Education Researchers’ Perceptions and Experiences Conducting Qualitative Research

Open access
Bush, Antonio A., Amechi, Mauriell, Persky, Adam·2020·American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Abstract

Objective. To investigate pharmacy education researchers' experiences in conducting qualitative research and their perceptions of qualitative research in pharmacy education Methods. A phenomenological approach was used to conduct one-time, in-depth interviews with 19 participants from 12 schools and colleges of pharmacy. Interview transcripts were coded and themes were identified using a modified form of the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift method of data analysis. Results. Faculty members were the largest subgroup in the sample, followed by graduate students, postdoctoral fellows/scholars, and residents. Pharmacy education researchers had varying levels of training in conducting qualitative research and some had none at all. Salient findings included that pharmacy educators' lack of training and exposure to qualitative research was a barrier to entry to conducting qualitative research; the lack of understanding and value of qualitative research in pharmacy education impacts the acceptability of qualitative research projects in Journals and academic meetings; and qualitative research offers several benefits in answering complex research questions. Conclusion. The application of rigorous qualitative research in pharmacy education holds great potential in addressing complex and evolving healthcare problems. This work provides empirical evidence of the ongoing anecdotal dialogue that has long existed in pharmacy education concerning why some researchers are hesitant to conduct qualitative research, the challenges encountered by those who employ qualitative approaches, and the benefits qualitative approaches provide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5688/ajpe7129

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pharmacy practice research has seen a steady increase in published qualitative studies in the last two decades.

    “Pharmacy practice research has seen a steady increase in published qualitative studies in the last two decades. 9,10”

    From Research and scholarly methods: Thematic analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bush, A. A., Amechi, M., & Persky, A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
ajpe7129
ISSN
0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2925333709
Cited by
26
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
qualitative research, researcher perceptions, research training
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Education, Pharmacy, Faculty, Fellowships and Scholarships, Humans, Internship and Residency, Interviews as Topic, Perception, Research, Students, Pharmacy, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review