Cited by 37COVID-19 and Mental HealthEducation during COVID-19 pandemicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Facilitating Wellbeing in a Turbulent Time

Open access
Brazeau, Gayle A., Frenzel, Jeanne E., Prescott, William A.·2020·American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Abstract

The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the way we live, work, and study. As faculty members, staff members, and students attempt to create and maintain a new normal because of this pandemic, the preservation of wellbeing becomes the responsibility of each and every one of us. The pandemic has taught us not to presume the importance of wellbeing and has allowed us time to reflect on establishing new assumptions and beliefs about how and when we work and study; how to be more efficient in our work and home responsibilities; and above all, what is most important. We must support ourselves and our students by maintaining a routine, modifying work and coursework expectations, and seeking psychosocial support if needed. Focusing on promoting wellbeing through leadership will move our institutions forward to a brighter future beyond COVID-19.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5688/ajpe8154

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Pharmacist Association . Enhancing well-being and resilience among the pharmacist workforce: A national consensus conferencehttps://www.pharmacist.com/enhancing-well-being-and-resilience-among-pharmacist-workforce-national-consensus-conference. Accessed May 7, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Brazeau, G. A., Frenzel, J. E., & Prescott, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Marshall University (US)
  • North Dakota State University (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
84
Issue
6
Pages
ajpe8154
ISSN
0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039686110
Cited by
37
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, well-being, psychosocial support, leadership, routine maintenance, student well-being, new normal, pharmacy education
MeSH terms
Faculty, Pharmacy, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Education, Pharmacy, Health Promotion, Health Status, Humans, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Students, Pharmacy, Coronavirus Infections, Resilience, Psychological, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review