Cited by 48Mental Health Treatment and AccessEthics in Clinical ResearchTreatment of Major Depression

Do doctors know best? Comments on a failed trial

Hunt, Caroline J, Andrews, Gavin, Shepherd, Louise M·2001·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

A randomised controlled trial was planned to compare two different treatment strategies--structured problem solving and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication--for patients with mild to moderate major depression. The trial was to be conducted in the primary care setting with all treatment given by general practitioners. When no patients had been recruited into the study after six months, we performed an audit of all patients with depressive symptoms attending the doctors' practices over three weeks. Exclusion criteria were changed to ease entry into the trial, but still no patients were recruited over the following six months. What went wrong?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143189.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunt, C. J., Andrews, G., & Shepherd, L. M.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Hunt, Caroline J
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2001-02
Volume
174
Issue
3
Pages
144-146
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2398688178
Cited by
48
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
randomized controlled trials, major depressive disorder, structured problem solving, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, primary care, general practitioners, exclusion criteria
MeSH terms
Australia, Depressive Disorder, Family Practice, Humans, Medical Audit, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review