Cited by 35Healthcare cost, quality, practicesRadiology practices and educationRadiation Dose and Imaging

Towards the appropriate use of diagnostic imaging

Mendelson, Richard M, Murray, Conor P J·2007·Medical Journal of Australia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01105.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendelson, R. M., & Murray, C. P. J.
Affiliations
Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Mendelson, Richard M
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2007-07
Volume
187
Issue
1
Pages
5-6
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W4237457080
Cited by
35
References
10
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
Keywords
diagnostic imaging, appropriate use, imaging utilization, overuse of imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review