Cited by 3Spine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAnesthesia and Pain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time to reconsider steroid injections in the spine?

Harris, Ian A, Buchbinder, Rachelle·2013·Medical Journal of Australia

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/mja13.11159

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harris, I. A., & Buchbinder, R.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Cabrini Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Harris, Ian A
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12
Volume
199
Issue
11
Pages
754-754
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2683865973
Cited by
3
References
6
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
corticosteroid injection, spine, intradiscal injection, epidural steroid injection, intervertebral disc, low back pain, corticosteroids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review