The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trees on farm: analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of Agroforestry ICRAF Working Paper no. 89
Open accessAbstract
Agroforestry, the inclusion of woody perennials within farming systems, has been both a traditional landuse approach developed by subsistence farmers throughout the tropics, and a livelihood option promoted by landuse managers and international development efforts. Agroforestry systems range from subsistence livestock and pastoral systems to home gardens, alley intercropping, and biomass plantations with a wide diversity of biophysical conditions and socio-ecological characteristics. The extent of its practice has never been quantified leading to widely varied estimates about its importance. This paper is the first attempt to quantify the extent of agroforestry at the global level. A geospatial analysis of remote sensing derived global datasets investigated the correspondence and relationship of tree cover, population density and climatic conditions within agricultural land at 1 km resolution. Among the key results are that agroforestry is a significant feature of agriculture in all regions, that its extent varies significantly across different regions (e.g. more significant in Central America and less in East Asia), that tree cover is strongly positively related to humidity, and that there are mixed relationships between tree cover and population density depending on the region. This first analysis suggests that patterns of tree cover are influenced by a range of factors we were not able to examine at the global scale and a number of follow up analyses are recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies
VERBURG, P. H., NEUMANN, K., & NOL, L. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02307.x · Cited by 624
The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems
Lal, R., Smith, P., Jungkunst, H. F., Mitsch, W. J., Lehmann, J., Nair, P. K. R., McBratney, A. B., de Moraes Sá, J. C., Schneider, J., Zinn, Y. L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.73.6.145a · Cited by 394
Intermediate tree cover can maximize groundwater recharge in the seasonally dry tropics
Ilstedt, U., Bargués Tobella, A., Bazié, H. R., Bayala, J., Verbeeten, E., Nyberg, G., Sanou, J., Benegas, L., Murdiyarso, D., Laudon, H., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21930 · Cited by 319
Shi, L., Feng, W., Xu, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.3136 · Cited by 266
A full greenhouse gases budget of Africa: Synthesis, uncertainties, and vulnerabilities
Valentini, R., Arneth, A., Bombelli, A., Castaldi, S., Cazzolla Gatti, R., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Grieco, E., Hartmann, J., Henry, M., et al. (2014) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-11-381-2014 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Zomer, R. A., Trabucco, A., Coe, R., & Place, F.
- Publisher
- World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W4236029715
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trees on farm: analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of Agroforestry ICRAF Working Paper no. 89. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5716/wp16263.pdf
- The paper
- Zomer, R. A., Trabucco, A., Coe, R., & Place, F. (2009). Trees on farm: analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of Agroforestry ICRAF Working Paper no. 89. https://doi.org/10.5716/wp16263.pdf
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.