The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agroforestry systems: Meta‐analysis of soil carbon stocks, sequestration processes, and future potentials
Open accessAbstract
Agroforestry (AF) has the potential to restore degraded lands, provide a broader range of ecosystem goods and services such as carbon (C) sequestration and high biodiversity, and increase soil fertility and ecosystem stability through additional C input from trees, erosion prevention, and microclimate improvement. Advantages and processes for global C sequestration in AF are unknown. We used a meta‐analysis of 427 soil C stock data pairs grouped into four main AF systems—alley cropping, windbreaks, silvopastures, and homegardens—and evaluated changes in AF and adjacent control cropland or pasture. Mean soil C stocks in AF (1‐m depth) were 126 Mg C·ha−1, which is 19% more than that in cropland or pasture. The highest C stocks in soil were in subtropical homegardens, AF with younger trees, and topsoil (0–20 cm). Increased soil C stocks in AF were lower than aboveground C stocks in most AF systems, except alley cropping. Homegardens stored the highest C in both aboveground and belowground, especially in the subsoil (20–100 cm). Advantages of AF ecosystem services focusing on mechanisms of belowground C sequestration were analyzed. AF could store 5.3 × 10 9 Mg additional C in soil on 944 Mha globally, with most in the tropics and subtropics. AF systems could greatly contribute to global soil C sequestration if used in larger areas. Future investigations of AF should include (a) mechanistic‐ and process‐based studies (instead of common monitoring and inventories), (b) models linking forest and crop growth with soil water and C and nutrient cycling, and (c) accurate assessments of the AF area worldwide based on the remote sensing approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition
Janssens, I. A., Dieleman, W., Luyssaert, S., Subke, J.-A., Reichstein, M., Ceulemans, R., Ciais, P., Dolman, A. J., Grace, J., Matteucci, G., et al. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo844 · Cited by 1,594
An Introduction to Agroforestry
Nair, P. K. R. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1608-4 · Cited by 1,438
Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration
Ramachandran Nair, P. K., Mohan Kumar, B., & Nair, V. D. (2009) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.200800030 · Cited by 1,157
Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems
Albrecht, A., & Kandji, S. T. (2003) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00138-5 · Cited by 1,074
Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation
Rillig, M. C. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/s04-003 · Cited by 1,061
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
Self-citationCycling downwards – dissolved organic matter in soils
Kaiser, K., & Kalbitz, K. (2012) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.002 · Cited by 839
Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry
Verchot, L. V., Van Noordwijk, M., Kandji, S., Tomich, T., Ong, C., Albrecht, A., Mackensen, J., Bantilan, C., Anupama, K. V., & Palm, C. (2007) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9105-6 · Cited by 789
Cited by
Positive but variable effects of crop diversification on biodiversity and ecosystem services
Beillouin, D., Ben‐Ari, T., Malézieux, E., Seufert, V., & Makowski, D. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15747 · Cited by 590
A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping
Jian, J., Du, X., Reiter, M. S., & Stewart, R. D. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735 · Cited by 555
Agroecology as a transformative approach to tackle climatic, food, and ecosystemic crises
Bezner Kerr, R., Postigo, J. C., Smith, P., Cowie, A., Singh, P. K., Rivera-Ferre, M., Tirado-von der Pahlen, M. C., Campbell, D., & Neufeldt, H. (2023) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101275 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, L., Feng, W., Xu, J., & Kuzyakov, Y.
- Venue
- Land Degradation & Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3886-3897
- ISSN
- 1085-3278 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-145X
- OpenAlex
- W2886254547
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 28.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agroforestry systems: Meta‐analysis of soil carbon stocks, sequestration processes, and future potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ldr.3136
- The paper
- Shi, L., Feng, W., Xu, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018). Agroforestry systems: Meta‐analysis of soil carbon stocks, sequestration processes, and future potentials. Land Degradation & Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.