The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management
Open accessAbstract
Moller, H., F. Berkes, P. Lyver and M. Kislalioglu 2004. Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management. Ecology and Society 9(3):2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00675-090302
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Together, they determined a low probability that the socialecological system is as healthy as it once was, and they found that where multiple Western science indicators were graded as “moderate” compared with the past, Indigenous knowledge indicators were graded as “low”—suggesting either that Western science is less able to detect incremental change given shorter timescales, or an unsubstantiated”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Moller et al., 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Redford, K. H. (1992) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311860 · Cited by 1,219
Cited by
ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 · Cited by 5,814
Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 · Cited by 3,847
Complexity of coupled human and natural systems
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144004 · Cited by 3,624
Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3 · Cited by 1,329
“…on the one hand, an opportunity for customary users to scrutinize science and, on the other hand, for science to learn about relationships and processes previously unknown (Moller et al. 2004; see also Prado et al. 2013 for complementarity between local and scientific knowledge of wildlife).”
BackgroundInfluential“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652
“…compared with the past, Indigenous knowledge indicators were graded as "low"—suggesting either that Western science is less able to detect incremental change given shorter timescales, or an unsubstantiated perception of change by Indigenous knowledge holders, or both (Moller et al., 2004).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P. O., & Kislalioglu, M.
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W168237287
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-00675-090302
- The paper
- Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P. O., & Kislalioglu, M. (2004). Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00675-090302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
