The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Political Economy of Cross-Scale Networks in Resource Co-Management
Open accessAbstract
We investigate linkages between stakeholders in resource management that occur at different spatial and institutional levels and identify the winners and losers in such interactions.So-called crossscale interactions emerge because of the benefits to individual stakeholder groups in undertaking them or the high costs of not undertaking them.Hence there are uneven gains from cross-scale interactions that are themselves an integral part of social-ecological system governance.The political economy framework outlined here suggests that the determinants of the emergence of cross-scale interactions are the exercise of relative power between stakeholders and their costs of accessing and creating linkages.Cross-scale interactions by powerful stakeholders have the potential to undermine trust in resource management arrangements.If government regulators, for example, mobilize information and resources from cross-level interactions to reinforce their authority, this often disempowers other stakeholders such as resource users.Offsetting such impacts, some cross-scale interactions can be empowering for local level user groups in creating social and political capital.These issues are illustrated with observations on resource management in a marine protected area in Tobago in the Caribbean.The case study demonstrates that the structure of the cross-scale interplay, in terms of relative winners and losers, determines its contribution to the resilience of social-ecological systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Adger et al. (2005) find that when cross-scale linkages are characterized by power asymmetries, more powerful actors seeking to further their interests can dominate the linkages in a way that further skews knowledge and information in their favor.”
From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Adger et al., 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Fukuyama, F., & Scott, J. C. (1998) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048980 · Cited by 8,418
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
(2001) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 4,566
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-1224 · Cited by 4,105
Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Levine, A., & Scott, J. C. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2655340 · Cited by 2,464
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x · Cited by 2,355
Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Scott, J. (1999) · Cited by 2,179
Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources
Agrawal, A. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00063-8 · Cited by 2,114
Rethinking Community‐Based Conservation
Berkes, F. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x · Cited by 1,890
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Berkes, F. 2002. Cross-scale institutional linkages for commons management: perspectives from the bottom up. Pages 293-321 in E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E.U. Weber, editors. The Drama of the Commons. National Academy, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Cash, D. W., W. N. Adger, F. Berkes, P. Garden, L. Lebel, P. Olsson, L. Pritchard, and O. Young. 2005. Cross-scale dynamics in human-environment systems. Ecology and Society. In press.
- Dolšak, N., and E. Ostrom. 2003. The challenge of the commons. Pages 3-34 in N. Dolšak and E. Ostrom, editors. The Commons in the New Millennium. MIT, Cambridge, UK.
- Foucault, M. 1986. Disciplinary power and subjection. Pages 229-242 in S. Lukes, editor. Power. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
- Pritchard, L., Jr., and S. E. Sanderson. 2002. The dynamics of political discourse in seeking sustainability. Pages 147-169 in L. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling, editors. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Richerson, P. J., R. Boyd, and B. Paciotti. 2002. An evolutionary theory of commons management. Pages 403-442 in E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E.U. Weber, editors. The Drama of the Commons. National Academy , Washington, D.C., USA.
- Young, O. R. 2005. Vertical interplay among scale- dependent resource regimes. Ecology and Society. In press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01759-110208 · Cited by 2,254
Self-citationAdaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework
Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2007) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348 · Cited by 2,280
Self-citationA framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation
Moser, S. C., & Ekstrom, J. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1007887107 · Cited by 1,878
Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J. H., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., et al. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03564-1504r01 · Cited by 1,570
Community-based conservation in a globalized world
Berkes, F. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702098104 · Cited by 1,184
Metadata
- Authors
- Adger, W. N., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L.
- Affiliations
- Tyndall Centre (GB)
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1918744767
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 71.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- cross-scale interactions, political economy, stakeholder power relations, marine protected areas, resilience, Tobago
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
