The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview
Open accessAbstract
The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) scenarios address changes in ecosystem services and their implications for human well-being.Ecological changes pose special challenges for longterm thinking, because of the possibility of regime shifts that occur rapidly yet alter the availability of ecosystem services for generations.Moreover, ecological feedbacks can intensify human modification of ecosystems, creating a spiral of poverty and ecosystem degradation.Such complex dynamics were evaluated by a mixture of qualitative and quantitative analyses in the MA scenarios.Collectively, the scenarios explore problems such as the connections of poverty reduction and ecosystem services, and trade-offs among ecosystem services.Several promising approaches are considered by the scenarios, including uses of biodiversity to build resilience of ecosystem services, actively adaptive management, and green technology.Although the scenarios do not prescribe an optimal path, they illuminate the consequences of different policies toward ecosystem services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Original Articles: Ecological Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale
Peterson, G., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900002 · Cited by 1,547
Self-citationWalker, B., Kinzig, A., & Langridge, J. (1999) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900062 · Cited by 1,062
Bushmeat Hunting, Wildlife Declines, and Fish Supply in West Africa
Brashares, J. S., Arcese, P., Sam, M. K., Coppolillo, P. B., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Balmford, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102425 · Cited by 637
Biodiversity may regulate the temporal variability of ecological systems
Cottingham, K. L., Brown, B. L., & Lennon, J. T. (2001) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00189.x · Cited by 493
Cited by
Folke, C. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09088-210444 · Cited by 982
Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet
Chapin, F. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kofinas, G. P., Folke, C., Abel, N., Clark, W. C., Olsson, P., Smith, D. M. S., Walker, B., Young, O. R., et al. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.008 · Cited by 971
Self-citationDecision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change
Polasky, S., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., & Keeler, B. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007 · Cited by 560
Self-citationKok, K. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.003 · Cited by 375
Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future
Duinker, P. N., & Greig, L. A. (2007) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.11.001 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpenter, S. R., Bennett, E. M., & Peterson, G. D.
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2488846707
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-01610-110129
- The paper
- Carpenter, S. R., Bennett, E. M., & Peterson, G. D. (2006). Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01610-110129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.