The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems
Open accessAbstract
Binder, C. R., J. Hinkel, P. W. G. Bots, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2013. Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 18(4): 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05551-180426
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656
Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437 · Cited by 3,136
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas
Ostrom, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104 · Cited by 2,728 · cited 3×
“They have to be dealt with in an integrative, interdisciplinary way that considers the interaction between social and ecological systems (Newell et al. 2005, Folke 2006, Young et al. 2006, Ostrom 2007, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodSmall is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered
Strange, S. (1974) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2615239 · Cited by 1,333
Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions
Scholz, R. W. (2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921520 · Cited by 332
Viewpoint: choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies
Galliers, R. D., & Land, F. F. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/32206.315753 · Cited by 181
Cited by
Partelow, S. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10594-230436 · Cited by 432
Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability
Leslie, H. M., Basurto, X., Nenadovic, M., Sievanen, L., Cavanaugh, K. C., Cota-Nieto, J. J., Erisman, B. E., Finkbeiner, E., Hinojosa-Arango, G., Moreno-Báez, M., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414640112 · Cited by 375
Anthropogenic, Direct Pressures on Coastal Wetlands
Newton, A., Icely, J., Cristina, S., Perillo, G. M. E., Turner, R. E., Ashan, D., Cragg, S., Luo, Y., Tu, C., Li, Y., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.00144 · Cited by 339
Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges
(2017) · Springer Series on Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2 · Cited by 197
A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services
Lescourret, F., Magda, D., Richard, G., Adam-Blondon, A.-F., Bardy, M., Baudry, J., Doussan, I., Dumont, B., Lefèvre, F., Litrico, I., et al. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G., & Pahl-Wostl, C.
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2320862185
- Cited by
- 797
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 28.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5751/es-05551-180426
- The paper
- Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05551-180426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
