Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 684

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hepatogastroenterology

·2011·Hepatogastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To detect the feasibility of using synchronous bile duct, left lobe of liver and common hepatic artery resection without reconstruction to improve the therapeutic efficacy of HC. METHODOLOGY: A total of 19 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma undergoing left-sided hepatectomy, hepatic artery resection and right hepatic duct-jejunum anastomosis from June 2005 to May 2010 in our team were included prospectively in this study. RESULTS: One case died from probable sudden myocardial infarction before discharge from hospital. Little bile leakage occurred in one case. No hepatic insufficiency developed in any cases. A follow-up of 6-66 months was applied and 11 cases were still alive at the end. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic Arteriectomy is viable with lower total bilirubin and the excision weight up to about 30% of the standard liver.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5754/hge11554

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 684

Metadata

Venue
Hepatogastroenterology
Published
2011-12-19
Volume
59
Issue
114
Pages
364-5
ISSN
0172-6390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W185696709
Cited by
684
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatogastroenterology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5754/hge11554
The paper
Hepatogastroenterology. (2011). Hepatogastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11554

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.