Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Stakeholder Approach Revisited

Open access
Freeman, R. Edward·2004·Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to revisit the development of the stakeholder management approach devel-oped in “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach ” published by Pitman Publishing in 1984. A brief history of the development of this approach is followed by a summary and an assess-ment of the main arguments. The approach has been used in a number of research streams which are outlined. The paper ends with some suggestions for promising lines of inquiry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5771/1439-880x-2004-3-228

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Freeman, R. E.
Venue
Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik
Publisher
Nomos Verlag
Published
2004
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
228-241
ISSN
1439-880X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564904248
Cited by
452
References
1
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Stakeholder Approach Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5771/1439-880x-2004-3-228
The paper
Freeman, R. E. (2004). The Stakeholder Approach Revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. https://doi.org/10.5771/1439-880x-2004-3-228

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.