Cited by 12Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesLegal and Social Justice StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Erfahrungen von Jugendlichen mit Cybergrooming: Schülerbefragung – Jugenddelinquenz

Open access
Bergmann, Marie Christine, Baier, Dirk·2016·Rechtspsychologie

Abstract

RPsych Rechtspsychologie , Seite 172 - 189

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5771/2365-1083-2016-2-172

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings regarding migration background and parents' relationship status were inconclusive in that no differences were found or that stable cybergrooming victims were more likely to have a migration background and separated parents than non-victims.

    “The findings regarding migration background and the parents' relationship status were inconclusive in that no differences were found (Bergmann & Baier, 2016; Wachs et al., 2012) or that stable cybergrooming victims were more likely to have a migration background and separated parents than non-victims (Gámez-Guadix et al., 2023; Wachs et al., 2012).”
  • Only communication via adult chat platforms predicted facets of cybergrooming, but communication via children chat platforms did not.

    “However, from a more differentiated perspective, only communication via adult chat platforms predicted facets of cybergrooming, but communication via children chat platforms did not (Bergmann & Baier, 2016).”
  • Risk-seeking as a general behavioral tendency predicted all four facets of cybergrooming identified in one study.

    “Risk-seeking as a general behavioral tendency predicted all four facets of cybergrooming identified in one study (Bergmann & Baier, 2016).”
  • The amount of Internet usage was positively associated with cybergrooming victimization, or at least facets of cybergrooming victimization, namely communication about personal matters and pretended feelings.

    “Strengthening the results on problematic Internet use, the amount of Internet usage was positively associated with cybergrooming victimization (Wachs et al., 2012), or at least facets of cybergrooming victimization, namely communication about personal matters and pretended feelings (Bergmann & Baier, 2016).”
  • Family support could be another protective factor for cybergrooming victimization, given the observed negative predictive power, while parental care was not associated with cybergrooming victimization.

    “Family support could be another protective factor for cybergrooming victimization, given the observed negative predictive power (Pasca et al., 2022), while parental care was not associated with cybergrooming victimization (Bergmann & Baier, 2016).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergmann, M. C., & Baier, D.
Venue
Rechtspsychologie
Publisher
Nomos Verlag
Published
2016
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
172-189
ISSN
2365-1083 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2443195617
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Rechtspsychologie (publishedVersion)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
online grooming, adolescents, juvenile delinquency, online sexual exploitation, victim experiences, school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review