Understanding Cybergrooming: A Systematic Review of Perpetrator Characteristics, Strategies, and Types
Open accessAbstract
This systematic review aimed to synthesize findings on the characteristics of individuals with cybergrooming offense histories (ICOs), their grooming strategies, and emergent typologies. The Cochrane approach guided the review. Publications were included if they investigated adult ICOs older than 18 years of age, their characteristics, the strategies they utilized, existing typologies, and if they were empirical studies. Overall, 2,603 publications were retrieved from PubMed, PsycInfo, Psyndex, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar, using a string-guided electronic search. The quality of all 22 publications that met the inclusion criteria was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the findings were synthesized. Results from 1,525 individuals across 22 studies revealed that ICOs tended to be male, around 30 years old, had few/no prior convictions, and were likely to have mental health problems. Strategies such as trying to build a real or feigned affectionate relationship via enticement, the introduction and pursuit of sexual content, and the assessment of the risk to be detected were common. Most studies differentiated between individuals who were primarily interested in an intimate relationship with the victim (the primarily intimacy-seeking) and those who were mainly interested in a quick satisfaction of their sexual needs (the primarily sexually preoccupied). Future research should focus on naturally occurring ICO/victim constellations and employ quantitative measures for adequate data collection. The findings underscore variety regarding strategies depending on ICOs’ underlying factors, the state of the conversation with the victim, and their overall intention.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148 · see citing works
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x · Cited by 11,385 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, systematic reviews are superior to narrative reviews, offering a more transparent, objective, reliable reproducible, and rigorous approach, minimizing bias (Munn et al., 2018).”
Hong, Q. N., Gonzalez‐Reyes, A., & Pluye, P. (2018) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12884 · Cited by 1,107 · see citing works
Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063210366039 · Cited by 960 · see citing works
Life History Theory and Evolutionary Psychology
Giudice, M. D., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych102 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the New Millennium
COOPER, A. (1998) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Ybarra, M. L. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.2.111 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & VanZuylen, H. (2014) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x · Cited by 331 · see citing works
The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis
Babchishin, K. M., Karl Hanson, R., & Hermann, C. A. (2011) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063210370708 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Briggs, P., Simon, W. T., & Simonsen, S. (2011) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063210384275 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Online Child Sexual Exploitation: Prevalence, Process, and Offender Characteristics
Kloess, J. A., Beech, A. R., & Harkins, L. (2014) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838013511543 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Black, P. J., Wollis, M., Woodworth, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2015) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.12.004 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Validation of the Sexual Grooming Model of Child Sexual Abusers
Winters, G. M., Jeglic, E. L., & Kaylor, L. E. (2020) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2020.1801935 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Seto, M. C., Wood, J. M., Babchishin, K. M., & Flynn, S. (2011) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/h0093925 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Psychiatric Disorders and Recidivism in Sexual Offenders
Långström, N., Sjöstedt, G., & Grann, M. (2004) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/107906320401600204 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Identifying sexual grooming themes used by internet sex offenders
Williams, R., Elliott, I. A., & Beech, A. R. (2013) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2012.707550 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Internet sexual activity: A comparison between contact and non-contact child pornography offenders
McCarthy, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552601003760006 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Kloess, J. A., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., & Beech, A. R. (2019) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063217720927 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Child Pornography and Likelihood of Contact Abuse
Long, M. L., Alison, L. J., & McManus, M. (2012) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063212464398 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
DeHart, D., Dwyer, G., Seto, M. C., Moran, R., Letourneau, E., & Schwarz-Watts, D. (2017) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2016.1241309 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The Psychological Profiles of Internet, Contact, and Mixed Internet/Contact Sex Offenders
Elliott, I. A., Beech, A. R., & Mandeville‐Norden, R. (2012) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063212439426 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Sexual offenders contacting children online: An examination of transcripts of sexual grooming
Winters, G. M., Kaylor, L. E., & Jeglic, E. L. (2017) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2016.1271146 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Chiang, E., & Grant, T. (2019) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amy007 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
A scoping review of child grooming strategies: pre- and post-internet
Ringenberg, T. R., Seigfried-Spellar, K. C., Rayz, J. M., & Rogers, M. K. (2022) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105392 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Ray, A., & Henry, N. (2025) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241277271 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Rapid skill acquisition and online sexual grooming of children
Quayle, E., Allegro, S., Hutton, L., Sheath, M., & Lööf, L. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.005 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Undetected and detected child sexual abuse and child pornography offenders
Neutze, J., Grundmann, D., Scherner, G., & Beier, K. M. (2012) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.02.004 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Cause ur special”: Understanding trust and complimenting behaviour in online grooming discourse
Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Izura, C. (2017) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.004 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Kloess, J. A., Seymour-Smith, S., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., Long, M. L., Shipley, D., & Beech, A. R. (2017) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063215612442 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
de Santisteban, P., del Hoyo, J., Alcázar-Córcoles, M. Á., & Gámez-Guadix, M. (2018) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.026 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Greene-Colozzi, E. A., Winters, G. M., Blasko, B., & Jeglic, E. L. (2020) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2020.1801938 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Bailey, J. M., Bernhard, P. A., & Hsu, K. J. (2016) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000213 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Psychotic Disorders and Sex Offending in a Danish Birth Cohort
Alden, A., Brennan, P. A., Hodgins, S., & Mednick, S. A. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.11.1251 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity
Joleby, M., Lunde, C., Landström, S., & Jonsson, L. S. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105214 · Cited by 59 · cited 19× · see citing works
“Overall, the use of bribes or gifts was not common in the studies included in this review and comprised offers of money, goods, or any currency attractive to the victim in exchange for sexual contact (de Santisteban et al., 2018; Joleby et al., 2021; van Gijn-Grosvenor & Lamb, 2021).”
InfluentialFactors associated with contact child sexual abuse in a sample of indecent image offenders
McManus, M., Long, M. L., Alison, L. J., & Almond, L. (2014) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2014.927009 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Houtepen, J. A. B. M., Sijtsema, J. J., & Bogaerts, S. (2014) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.011 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
A Comparison of Victim and Offender Perspectives of Grooming and Sexual Abuse
Whittle, H. C., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., & Beech, A. R. (2015) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2014.944074 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Broome, L. J., Izura, C., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2018) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.021 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Behavioural Differences Between Online Sexual Groomers Approaching Boys and Girls
van Gijn-Grosvenor, E. L., & Lamb, M. E. (2016) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2016.1189473 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Risk-Taking, Antisocial Behavior, and Life Histories
Mishra, S., & Lalumière, M. L. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325188.003.0008 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A typology of offenders who use online communications to commit sex crimes against minors
Tener, D., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2015) · Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926771.2015.1009602 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Seymour‐Smith, S., & Kloess, J. A. (2021) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12437 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
From online to offline sexual offending: Episodes and obstacles
Fortin, F., Paquette, S., & Dupont, B. (2018) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.01.003 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Lawless space theory for online child sexual exploitation material offending
Steel, C. M. S., Newman, E., O’Rourke, S., & Quayle, E. (2023) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2022.101809 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Online groomer typology scheme
van Gijn-Grosvenor, E. L., & Lamb, M. E. (2021) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2021.1876048 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A Preventive Intervention to Reduce Risk of Online Grooming Among Adolescents
Calvete, E., Orue, I., & Gámez-Guadi, M. (2022) · Psychosocial Intervention · doi:10.5093/pi2022a14 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Pedagogic interventions such as the one by Calvete et al. (2022), which aimed to inform young people about cybergrooming and decision-making in a cybergrooming context, reduced the sexual interactions of young people with adults.”
Kranenbarg, M. W., van Gelder, J., Barends, A. J., & de Vries, R. E. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107576 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Schittenhelm, C., Kops, M., Moosburner, M., Fischer, S. M., & Wachs, S. (2025) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-024-00248-w · Cited by 25 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Internationally, results from the systematic review by Schittenhelm et al. (2024) indicate a prevalence rate of 10% to 20% for cybergrooming victimization across 34 studies.”
Self-citationPolicing Online Child Sexual Abuse
Martellozzo, E. (2015) · European Journal of Policing Studies · doi:10.5553/ejps/2034760x2015003001003 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Gámez‐Guadix, M., Mateos‐Pérez, E., Alcázar, M. A., Martínez‐Bacaicoa, J., & Wachs, S. (2023) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12240 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationForni (2021) · PubMed · doi:10.7416/ai.2020.2353 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While multiple narrative and scoping reviews have focused separately on the grooming process and the characteristics of ICOs (Forni et al., 2020; Kloess et al., 2014) or on-and offline cybergrooming strategies (Ringenberg et al., 2022), previous systematic reviews have only investigated ICOs…”
Aitken, S., Gaskell, D., & Hodkinson, A. (2018) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2017.1410372 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Male Sexual Interest In and Offending Against Children: The Abused-Abuser Hypothesis
Alanko, K., Schmidt, A. F., Neutze, J., Bergen, E., Santtila, P., & Osterheider, M. (2017) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/24732850.2017.1286544 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationErfahrungen von Jugendlichen mit Cybergrooming: Schülerbefragung – Jugenddelinquenz
Bergmann, M. C., & Baier, D. (2016) · Rechtspsychologie · doi:10.5771/2365-1083-2016-2-172 · Cited by 12 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…in turn, could increase the reporting behavior of those affected by cybergrooming, which may lead to more accurate prevalence rates for victimization as well as an increase in the discovery of previously unidentified ICOs (Bergmann & Baier, 2016; Landesanstalt für Medien Nordhein-Westfalen, 2024).”
Barber, C. S., & Bettez, S. C. (2021) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1816146 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Quayle, E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66654-5_4 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Baúto, R. V., Cardoso, J., & Leal, I. M. P. (2021) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/24732850.2021.1999055 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Kloess, J. A., Larkin, M., Beech, A. R., & Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E. (2019) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063218769031 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Nikolovska, M. (2020) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kinder und Jugendliche als Opfer von Cybergrooming
Wagner, V. (2024) · merz | medien + erziehung · doi:10.21240/merz/2024.4.01 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Konsum von Missbrauchsabbildungen: Prävalenz, Ätiologie, Fallpriorisierung und Prognose
Lehmann, R., Babchishin, K. M., & Schmidt, A. F. (2023) · Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie · doi:10.1007/s11757-022-00752-6 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationSexueller Kindesmissbrauch: Opfer, Täter und Sanktionen
Bosinski, H. A. G. (1997) · Sexuologie Zeitschrift für Sexualmedizin Sexualtherapie und Sexualwissenschaft · doi:10.61387/s.1997.2.9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Albert, C. S. (2014) · NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Winters, G. M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07222-2_5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schittenhelm, C., Weber, C., Kops, M., & Wachs, S. (2025) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-025-02192-x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…by manipulating the victim into perceiving the situation as an exclusive and unique relationship that requires protection from others, or by threatening to release sexually explicit material sent by the victim if they disclose the situation (Moosburner et al., 2025; Ringenberg et al., 2022).”
Self-citationExtremism and online child sexual abuse: a commentary
Quayle, E., Allardyce, S., Leonard, M. M., Jennings, B., & Richardson, R. (2026) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2025.2602791 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Stability of Cybergrooming Victimization Among Adolescents: A One-Year Latent Transition Analysis
Schittenhelm, C., Gámez‐Guadix, M., & Wachs, S. (2026) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-026-02333-w · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationAdolescence et cybergrooming, une violence méconnue en France
Romano, H., Fierdepied, S., & Ribadier, A. (2025) · Neuropsychiatrie de l Enfance et de l Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.neurenf.2025.12.001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Porcelli, C., Anderson, F., & Kloess, J. A. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380251411261
Präventions- und Interventionsansätze bei Cybergrooming. Ein Narratives Review
Moosburner, M., Kuban, T., Weber, C., & Rettenberger, M. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung · doi:10.1055/a-2665-4187
Self-citationCieślińska, Z., & Hanusz, K. (2026) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1177/21522715261458454
Abuov, A. G., Moldagaliyeva, A. D., Abdukerova, A. M., & Yensebayeva, A. R. (2026) · Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law · doi:10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-2-329-340
Villabos, R. N., Gooco, J. M. G., Vila, M. E., & Villamil, F. (2026) · EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR) · doi:10.36713/epra28866
Online-Initiated Contact and Child Sexual Abuse Severity: A Forensic Cross-Sectional Study
Aslan, F., Aydoğan, H. C., Teke, H. Y., Pakiş, I., & Özel, D. (2026) · Children · doi:10.3390/children13081097
Ashour, K., Alshammari, B. S., Alfraidi, K. N., Mekheimer, M. A. A. G., & Ali, J. H. M. (2026) · Corpus Pragmatics · doi:10.1007/s41701-026-00259-z
Schittenhelm, C., Kops, M., & Wachs, S. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/8183851
Self-citation
- Authors
- Moosburner, M., Weber, C., Kuban, T., Wachs, S., Schmidt, A. F., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger, M.
- Affiliations
- Kriminologische Zentralstelle (DE)
- Bundeskriminalamt (DE)
- University of Münster (DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Moosburner, Maeve
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2025-02-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 429-447
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W4407706241
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13N16613)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Keywords
- online grooming, offender characteristics, offender typology, sexual preoccupation, offender mental health, prior convictions, risk assessment
- MeSH terms
- Cyberbullying, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
