Cited by 43Race, History, and American SocietyEmotional Labor in ProfessionsRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Cabin Pressure: African American Pilots, Flight Attendants, and Emotional Labor

Evans, Louwanda·2013·Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks

Abstract

From African American pilots being asked to carry people’s luggage to patrons refusing drinks from African American flight attendants, Cabin Pressure demonstrates that racism is still very much alive in the “friendly skies.” Author Louwanda Evans draws on provocative interviews with African Americans in the flight industry to examine the emotional labor involved in a business that offers occupational prestige, but also a history of the systemic exclusion of people of color.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5771/9781442221369

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, L.
Corresponding author
Evans, Louwanda
Venue
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks
Published
2013
OpenAlex
W4393060914
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.02
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
flight attendants, airline industry, emotional labor, racial discrimination, occupational prestige, airline passengers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review