The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, layered manufacturing (LM) processes have begun to progress from rapid prototyping techniques towards rapid manufacturing methods, where the objective is now to produce finished components for potential end use in a product (Caulfield et al., 2007). LM is especially promising for the fabrication of specific need, low volume products such as replacement parts for larger systems. This trend accentuates the need for a thorough understanding of the associated mechanical properties and the resulting behavior of parts produced by layered methods. Not only must the base material be durable, but the mechanical properties of the layered components must be sufficient to meet in-service loading and operational requirements, and be reasonably comparable to parts produced by more traditional manufacturing techniques. This chapter presents the details of a study completed to quantitatively analyze the potential of fused deposition modelling to fully evolve into a rapid manufacturing tool. The project objective is to develop an understanding of the dependence of the mechanical properties of FDM parts on raster orientation and to assess whether these parts are capable of maintaining their integrity while under service loading. The study examines the effect of fiber orientation, i.e. the direction of the polymer beads relative to the loading direction of the part, on a variety of important mechanical properties of ABS components fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Tensile, compressive, flexural, impact, and fatigue strength properties of FDM specimens are examined, evaluated, and placed in context in comparison with the properties of injection molded ABS parts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R. (2018) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 · Cited by 1,015
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2021) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 · Cited by 538
Process–Structure–Properties in Polymer Additive Manufacturing via Material Extrusion: A Review
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Tan, H. K. J., Sing, S. L., Goh, G. L., & Yeong, W. Y. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408436.2018.1549977 · Cited by 429
Fused filament fabrication of polymer materials: A review of interlayer bond
Gao, X., Qi, S., Kuang, X., Su, Y., Li, J., & Wang, D. (2021) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101658 · Cited by 418
Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications
Vaezi, M., & Yang, S. (2015) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2015.1097053 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziemian, C., Sharma, M., & Ziemi, S.
- Venue
- Mechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- InTech
- Published
- 2012-04-11
- ISSN
- 0025-6501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129081415
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5772/34233
- The paper
- Ziemian, C., Sharma, M., & Ziemi, S. (2012). Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling. Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.5772/34233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.