The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications
Abstract
There has been a trend in recent years to develop polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-based medical devices due to the excellent cell biocompatibility and desirable mechanical properties of PEEK, which has elastic modulus comparable to cortical bone. Different manufacturing techniques such as injection moulding, particulate leaching, compression moulding, and selective laser sintering (SLS) have been used to produce porous PEEK for biomedical applications. Despite a large number of publications on extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) of porous structures using various materials, there have been very few general reports on extrusion AM of low quality small PEEK parts without defects such as warpage and delamination and no further assessment of mechanical properties. Successful low-cost 3D printing of PEEK structures using filament-based extrusion AM process is reported in this paper for the first time. Hot extrusion head design, extrusion temperature, and ambient temperature were identified as important factors need to be taken into consideration for printing PEEK structures without warpage, delamination, and polymer degradation. Compression and tensile tests were conducted to investigate mechanical properties of these new 3D printed PEEK structures. The air gap between infill pattern and entrapped micro-bubbles inside filaments were identified as the main source of mechanical properties reduction. In addition, three-point flexural test was performed on the 3D printed PEEK and compared with flexural specimens printed using other AM materials and techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants
Kurtz, S. M., & Devine, J. N. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 · Cited by 2,388
Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS
Ahn, S., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., & Wright, P. K. (2002) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540210441166 · Cited by 2,382
A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies
Vaezi, M., Seitz, H., & Yang, S. (2013) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2 · Cited by 1,293
Self-citationTan, K. H., Chua, C. K., Leong, K. F., Cheah, C. M., Cheang, P., Abu Bakar, M. S., & Cha, S. W. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00131-5 · Cited by 625
Vaezi, M., Chianrabutra, S., Mellor, B., & Yang, S. (2013) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2013.778175 · Cited by 548
Self-citationRae, P., Brown, E., & Orler, E. B. (2006) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.032 · Cited by 399
Zhao, Y., Wong, H. M., Wang, W., Li, P., Xu, Z., Chong, E. Y. W., Yan, C. H., Yeung, K. W. K., & Chu, P. K. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.071 · Cited by 387
Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling
Ziemian, C., Sharma, M., & Ziemi, S. (2012) · Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.5772/34233 · Cited by 387
Selective Laser Sintering of PEEK
Schmidt, M., Pohle, D., & Rechtenwald, T. (2007) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.097 · Cited by 305
Wang, L., He, S., Wu, X., Liang, S., Mu, Z., Wei, J., Deng, F., Deng, Y., & Wei, S. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.085 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Yang, C., Tian, X., Li, D., Cao, Y., Zhao, F., & Shi, C. (2017) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 · Cited by 662
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2021) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 · Cited by 538
Effects of extrusion speed and printing speed on the 3D printing stability of extruded PEEK filament
Geng, P., Zhao, J., Wu, W., Ye, W., Wang, Y., Wang, S., & Zhang, S. (2019) · Journal of Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.023 · Cited by 321
Additive layer manufacturing of poly (ether ether ketone) via FDM
Rinaldi, M., Ghidini, T., Cecchini, F., Brandao, A., & Nanni, F. (2018) · Composites Part B Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029 · Cited by 301
Performance of biocompatible PEEK processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing
Arif, M. F., Kumar, S., Varadarajan, K. M., & Cantwell, W. J. (2018) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.015 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaezi, M., & Yang, S.
- Venue
- Virtual and Physical Prototyping
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 123-135
- ISSN
- 1745-2759 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2767
- OpenAlex
- W2204134898
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 22.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17452759.2015.1097053
- The paper
- Vaezi, M., & Yang, S. (2015). Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1097053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
