Cited by 6Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovations in Medical Education

Challenges in Implementing Artificial Intelligence for Nursing Education: A Systematic Review

Open access
Dehghani, Mohammad, Pourasad, Mohammad Hossein, Khezri, Hero·2025·Educational Research in Medical Sciences

Abstract

Context: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in health sciences education offers numerous benefits; however, a lack of awareness regarding the limitations of these tools may lead to financial and human losses. Objectives: Given that nurses constitute the largest segment of the healthcare team and their education is of paramount importance, this study explores the challenges associated with the use of AI in nursing education. Data Sources: A systematic review was conducted in 2025, utilizing databases such as ERIC, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to search for relevant studies. The search employed appropriate keywords, with limitations set to articles published within the last five years and in English. Study Selection: After identifying relevant articles, their quality was assessed using suitable tools. This step ensured that only high-quality studies were included in the review, providing a reliable basis for analysis. Data Extraction: Various data were extracted, categorized, and analyzed. This comprehensive approach allowed for a thorough examination of the challenges associated with the use of AI in nursing education. Results: Out of 307 identified studies, 18 articles were reviewed. Based on the findings of this study, the challenges associated with the use of AI in nursing education were categorized into six main groups: Educational, technological, ethical, trust-building, human resource, and economic challenges. Conclusions: The challenges identified in this study were grouped into six primary categories, with the roots of these challenges linked to issues related to educational organizations, personnel capabilities, and the design of AI systems. Recognizing the challenges of using AI in nursing education can not only prevent unintended problems but also aid in preserving economic and human resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5812/ermsj-162371

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Dehghani, M., Pourasad, M. H., & Khezri, H.
Affiliations
Urmia University (IR)
Corresponding author
Pourasad, Mohammad Hossein
Venue
Educational Research in Medical Sciences
Publisher
Brieflands
Published
2025-05-31
Volume
14
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2252-0341 (ISSN-L)
  • 2252-0465
OpenAlex
W4410965487
Cited by
6
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Educational research in medical sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, nursing education, implementation barriers, educational challenges, technical challenges, ethical considerations, trust building, HRM challenges, economic problems, AI system design, employee competence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review