Cited by 83Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationDigital literacy in education

AI literacy and competency in nursing education: preparing students and faculty members for an AI- enabled future-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
El-Banna, Majeda M., Sajid, Mirza Rizwan, Rizvi, Moattar Raza, Sami, Waqas, McNelis, Angela M.·2025·Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made its way into every dimension of human life, and its impact is significant and multifaceted. Specifically, the effect of AI in nursing education has reshaped the healthcare system. However, this technological shift in nursing and the healthcare system still needs to be evaluated in multiple aspects to ensure the effective use of AI and to prepare future professionals. Methods: This PROSPERO-registered systematic literature review and meta-analysis explored the integration of AI literacy and competency within nursing curricula and the profession globally from January 2020 to June 2025. The study specifically aimed to: (1) examine the extent of AI integration within nursing curricula; (2) assess the awareness, attitudes, and readiness of nursing students, faculty, and practitioners toward AI; (3) evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions designed to enhance AI literacy and competency; (4) identify ethical, institutional, and pedagogical challenges associated with AI adoption in nursing education; and (5) provide evidence-based recommendations for standardized and equitable AI education frameworks in nursing. Results: The review synthesizes evidence from 111 peer-reviewed articles, including 18 distinct quantitative studies, which have been further analyzed through meta-analytic techniques. PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for relevant articles and extract the required information. Meta-analysis reveals high levels of AI-related awareness (pooled estimate = 73%, 95% CI: 64–80%) and positive attitudes (71%, 95% CI: 63–78%) among various nursing groups. The implementation of AI-related skills remains highly variable (67%, 95% CI: 55–78%), especially in low-resource settings, which needs careful interpretation. Overall, meta-analysis findings highlight significant variations and reflect non-uniformity and disparities across regions, institutions, and nursing groups (students, staff, faculty). Conclusion: Thematic synthesis underscores the need for standardized AI education, tailored faculty development, and equitable access to digital tools. Although individual-level awareness and attitudes toward AI are promising, this review reveals a lack of institutional readiness, with many nursing programs lacking standardized curricula, faculty training, and infrastructural support. Moreover, findings emphasize the critical need for broader institutional and policy efforts to match individual enthusiasm with institutional capacity in preparing nurses for an AI-enabled healthcare landscape. Further, this review offers evidence-based recommendations for various stakeholders to ensure inclusive and future-ready nursing education. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD420251090108.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2025.1681784

Cites

133 of 136 references verified3 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [55]Xin W Huiping M. Application evaluation of AI-assisted teaching in basic nursing education. Front Educ Res. (2021) 4: 113– 5. 10.1016/j.teln.2025.01.019 · DOI
  2. [63]Al-Sabawy MR. Artificial intelligence in nursing: a study on nurses’ perceptions and readiness. Proceedings of the 1st International & 6th Science Conference Kirkuk Health Directorate. Kirkuk: (2023).
  3. [87]Hyun JM Ran KM. Analysis of artificial intelligence research trends in nursing. Int J Adv Smart Converg. (2024) 13: 475– 86. 10.7236/IJASC.2024.13.4.475 · DOI
  4. [91]Asiri TY Alghamdi HK Alharbi RM Alharbi NM Bakri AA Moafa AM Artificial intelligence and nursing care: Revolutionizing patient diagnosis and treatment strategies: most recent literature review based study. J Int Crisis Risk Commun Res. (2024) 7(S11): 1375– 90. 10.63278/jicrcr.vi.1287 · DOI
  5. [94]Nassef E Zeid IA. Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Descriptive Literature Review of the Evidence. (2024). Available online at: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2024050810012 [accessed April 4, 2025].
  6. [95]Patel J. Artificial intelligence in nursing education: a review of implementation and impact. Nurs Res Pract. (2025) 1: 24– 30.
  7. [101]Kimiafar K Sarbaz M Tabatabaei SM Ghaddaripouri K Mousavi AS Mehneh MR Artificial intelligence literacy among healthcare professionals and students: a systematic review. Front Health Inform. (2023) 12: 168. 10.18502/fhi.v12i1.11964 · DOI
  8. [121]Qtait M. The impact of artificial intelligence on nursing students: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Pract. (2025) 84: 104345. 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104345 40168750 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [124]El Arab RA Al Moosa OA Abuadas FH Somerville J. The role of AI in nursing education and practice: Umbrella review. J Med Internet Res. (2025) 27: e69881. 10.2196/69881 40072926 PMC12008698 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [134]Labrague LJ Aguilar-Rosales R Yboa BC Sabio JB Santos JA. Student nurses’ attitudes, perceived utilization, and intention to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) technology in nursing practice: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Pract. (2023) 73: 103815. 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103815 37922736 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [135]Lukić A Kudelić N Antićević V Lazić-Mosler E Glunčić V Hren D First-year nursing students’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence: cross-sectional multi-center study. Nurse Educ Pract. (2023) 71: 103735. 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103735 37541081 · DOI
  12. [139]Qutishat M Al-Hadidi M Shakman L Al-Shdefat A Al-Ghunaimi AA Al-Barwani SS. Benefits, challenges, and future recommendations in the integration of artificial intelligence in nursing education: a scoping review. Teach Learn Nurs. (2025) 20: e1315– 23. 10.1016/j.teln.2025.100643 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Banna, M. M., Sajid, M. R., Rizvi, M. R., Sami, W., & McNelis, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Gujrat (PK)
  • Santosh University (IN)
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Sami, Waqas
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2025-11-26
Volume
12
Pages
1681784-1681784
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416730328
Cited by
62
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 62
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Qatar University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in nursing education, AI literacy, AI competencies, nursing curriculum, nursing students, nursing faculty, attitudes toward AI, AI awareness, AI readiness, faculty development, institutional readiness, digital divide, resource-limited settings, ethics of AI in healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review