Cited by 21Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation among university students

Open access
Norouzi, Mohadeseh, Zargar, Fatemeh, Norouzi, Fatemeh·2017·Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Background: The acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a novel method for resolving interpersonal problems. Objectives: This study aimed at determining the effectiveness of ACT on interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation among female students with interpersonal problems. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, the study population consisted of 70 female students, who were selected via purposive sampling from Azad University of Gorgan, Iran. The study population was randomly categorized to intervention (ACT group) and control groups. The intervention group consisted of ten 90-minute ACT sessions, held by a trained clinical psychologist, according to a study by Mckay, Lev and Skeen (2012). The data collection tools included two short-form questionnaires, including the inventory of interpersonal problems (IIP-32) and difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS). Pre-test and post-test scores were analyzed, using covariance methods. Results: Generally, the findings showed a significant difference in the post-test scores between the control and ACT groups following the intervention. Conclusions: Based on the findings, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) can be effective in improvement of interpersonal problems and emotional dysregulation.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a randomized clinical trial of female Iranian university students with interpersonal problems, group acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) significantly reduced interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation compared with a no-training control at posttest (P < 0.001). The authors conclude ACT can be effective for these outcomes.

Key findings

  • Posttest scores differed significantly between the ACT and control groups for interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation (P < 0.001).
  • In the ACT group, mean scores for interpersonal relations and emotion regulation difficulties decreased from pretest to posttest compared with the control group.
  • The authors state that ACT improved interpersonal problems and emotional dysregulation among female university students.

Methods

  • Randomized clinical trial conducted at Azad University of Gorgan, Iran, between September and November 2015; participants were female students aged 18–35 with an IIP-32 score above 40, no psychotic disorders, no psychotherapy/pharmacotherapy in the past 6 months, and no addiction or suicide history; exclusion if absent from more than 2 sessions.
  • The abstract reports 70 female students; the methods report 150 screened, 80 selected and randomized; the results report that among 66 participants, 5 from the intervention group and 4 from the control group were excluded. The ACT group received ten 90-minute sessions by a trained clinical psychologist based on McKay, Lev, and Skeen (2012); the control group received no training. Measures were the IIP-32 and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) at pretest and posttest.
  • Analysis used covariance, t test, and chi-square, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: only female participants, small sample size, and lack of follow-up sessions; the authors recommend larger groups, longer follow-ups, both genders, and more diverse samples.
  • Evident from the text: sample size reporting is inconsistent across the abstract, methods, and results (70 vs. 80 vs. 66 participants), and the control group received no training rather than an active comparison, so non-specific effects cannot be ruled out.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5812/ijpbs.8005

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § 4. Results

    There were significant differences between the experimental and control groups in interpersonal problems in the posttest stage (P < 0.001).

    “The result of covariance showed that there were significant differences between the experimental and control groups in interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation in the posttest stage (P < 0.001) (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4. Results

    There were significant differences between the experimental and control groups in difficulties in emotion regulation in the posttest stage (P < 0.001).

    “The result of covariance showed that there were significant differences between the experimental and control groups in interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation in the posttest stage (P < 0.001) (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4. Results

    In the ACT group, mean interpersonal relations scores decreased from pretest to posttest.

    “evaluation of the mean scores of dependant variables (interpersonal relations and emotion regulation difficulties) and comparison of pretest and posttest scores showed that the mean scores of interpersonal relations and emotion regulation difficulties decreased in the ACT group in the posttest in comparsion with the pretest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4. Results

    In the ACT group, mean emotion regulation difficulties scores decreased from pretest to posttest.

    “evaluation of the mean scores of dependant variables (interpersonal relations and emotion regulation difficulties) and comparison of pretest and posttest scores showed that the mean scores of interpersonal relations and emotion regulation difficulties decreased in the ACT group in the posttest in comparsion with the pretest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § 1. Background

    ACT can be used as an effective therapy to improve psychological flexibility in people with interpersonal problems through acceptance techniques and cognitive defusion of thoughts, emotions, and beliefs.

    “Since people with interpersonal problems have rigid and inflexible models of behavior, ACT can be used as an effective therapy to improve their psychological flexibility through adopting acceptance techniques and cognitive defusion of thoughts, emotions, and beliefs (schemas) (3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] McKay M, 2012, Acceptance and commitment therapy for interpersonal problems: Using mindfulness, acceptance, and schema awareness to change interpersonal behaviors.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • May combine two claims. 12
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Background

    Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a novel method used to overcome interpersonal issues and a wide range of psychological problems.

    “Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a novel method used to overcome interpersonal issues and a wide range of psychological problems (18).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Ruiz FJ, 2010, Revista Internacional de Psicologia y Terapia Psicologica.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 3. Materials and Methods

    Participants were categorized to control and intervention groups using a table of random numbers.

    “By using the table of random numbers, the participants were categorized to control and intervention groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The IIP-32 subscales had internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.60 to 0.83, and total consistency of 0.81 and 0.86.

    “The IIP subscales’ internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which was 0.60 to 0.83 and for the total consistency a score of 0.81 and 0.86 was determined (31).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Barkham M, 1996, Br J Clin Psychol. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 5. Discussion

    ACT techniques are useful in maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, with development of emotional awareness, and focus on different aspects of emotional regulation.

    “An explanation for the mentioned finding is that ACT techniques are useful in maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, with development of emotional awareness, and focus on different aspects of emotional regulation (41, 42).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [42] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. Discussion

    ACT and a combination of schema therapy formulation could help improve interpersonal relations through acceptance techniques and defusion of thoughts, emotions, and beliefs.

    “To explain such findings, it can be said that ACT and a combination of scheme therapy formulation (such as maladaptive interpersonal schemes) aiming at the improvement of psychological flexibility could help improve interpersonal relations through acceptance techniques and defusion of thoughts, emotions, and beliefs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] McKay M, 2012, Acceptance and commitment therapy for interpersonal problems: Using mindfulness, acceptance, and schema awareness to change interpersonal behaviors.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Questionnaire had validity of 0.93 and reliability of 0.80 using Cronbach's alpha.

    “Graz reported the validity of the questionnaire as 0.93 and its reliability was 0.80, using Cronbach’s alpha (9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Persian version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Questionnaire had reliability of 0.86 and 0.80 using Cronbach's alpha and split-half methods.

    “Two methods of Cronbach’s alpha and split-half were used to calculate reliability, which was 0.86 and 0.80, respectively, proving acceptable coefficients for the emotional regulation difficulties questionnaire.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Khanzadeh M, 2012, Int J Behav Sci.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Discussion

    ACT does not aim at removing or changing individuals' core schemas and beliefs, but helps them accept the pain associated with these schemas and improve behavioral flexibility.

    “In fact, ACT does not aim at removing or changing the individuals’ core schemas and beliefs, yet it rather helps them accept the pain associated with these schemas through different methods (e.g. acceptance, cognitive defusion, being present, self as context, values, and committed action) and improve their behavioral flexibility to promote a principled way of life (3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] McKay M, 2012, Acceptance and commitment therapy for interpersonal problems: Using mindfulness, acceptance, and schema awareness to change interpersonal behaviors.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Discussion

    ACT focuses on acceptance techniques for dealing with maladaptive emotion regulation strategies (such as suppression) and encourages patients to accept pain instead of changing or removing unwanted thoughts and emotions such as anxiety and guilt.

    “Furthermore, ACT focuses on acceptance techniques for dealing with maladaptive emotion regulation strategies (such as suppression). In this fashion, it encourages patients to accept the pain instead of changing or removing unwanted thoughts and emotions such as anxiety and guilt (20).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Flaxman PE, 2010, Acceptance and commitment therapy: Distinctive features. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § 4. Results

    Among 66 participants, 5 from the intervention group and 4 from the control group were excluded because they were absent for more than 2 sessions and unwilling to complete the questionnaires.

    “Among 66 participants, 5 cases from the intervention group and 4 cases from the control group were excluded, as they were absent from the intervention for more than 2 sessions and were unwilling to complete the questionnaires.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Discussion

    ACT strategies improve self-awareness, self-observation, emotion regulation, positive emotional reactions in interpersonal relations, and environmental control.

    “In addition, ACT strategies improve self-awareness, self-observation, emotion regulation, positive emotional reactions in interpersonal relations, and environmental control (28).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5. Discussion

    People with interpersonal problems can overcome their poor emotional regulation and interpersonal problems through ACT.

    “The present study showed that people with interpersonal problems can overcome their poor emotional regulation and interpersonal problems through ACT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5. Discussion

    Several experimental studies have shown that acceptance strategies positively affect emotion regulation, reduce physiological arousal, and promote effective responses in emotional control.

    “Several experimental studies have shown that acceptance strategies positively effect emotion regulation, reduce physiological arousal, and promote effective responses in emotional control (43, 44).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [43] George B, 2015, Indian J Pos Psychol.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5. Discussion

    Administration of ACT leads to a decrease in interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation scores among university students.

    “The results showed that administration of acceptance and commitment therapy leads to a decrease in interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation scores; therefore, intervention played an effective role in improvement of interpersonal problems and difficulties in emotion regulation among university students.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
14 of 14
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Interpersonal problems are increasingly prevalent, especially among students.

    “Therefore, given the increasing prevalence of these problems, especially among students, the importance of treatment is strongly felt in different communities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ultimate aim of ACT is to achieve emotion regulation and psychological flexibility.

    “In fact, the ultimate aim of ACT is to achieve emotion regulation and psychological flexibility.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Different numbers of students reported as selected

    Minor

    The abstract says 70 female students were selected and randomly assigned, whereas the methods say 80 students were selected and randomly assigned. The text does not reconcile the two counts.

  • Gratz and Tull citation year differs from reference

    Minor

    The discussion identifies the Gratz and Tull work as published in 2006, but the corresponding reference lists 2010.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Rodriguez JO, 2006, Psicothema., 18, 207
  2. McKay M, 2012, Acceptance and commitment therapy for interpersonal problems: Using mindfulness, acceptance, and schema awareness to change interpersonal behaviors.
  3. Levenson H, 2012, Time-limited dynamic psychotherapy. The art and science of brief psychotherapies: An illustrated guide.
  4. Klerman GL, 1994, Interpersonal psychotherapy of depression: A brief, focused, specific strategy.
  5. Ruiz FJ, 2010, Revista Internacional de Psicologia y Terapia Psicologica., 10, 125
  6. Luoma JB, 2007, Learning ACT: An acceptance & commitment therapy skills-training manual for therapists.
  7. Vakili Y, 2014, Iran J Psychiatry., 9, 115
  8. Fath N, 2013, J Clin Psycol., 5, 69
  9. Khanzadeh M, 2012, Int J Behav Sci., 6, 87
  10. Lev A, 2011, A New Group Therapy Protocol Combining Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Schema Therapy in the Treatment of Interpersonal Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
  11. Gratz KL, 2010, Emotion regulation as a mechanism of change in acceptance-and mindfulness-based treatments. Assessing mindfulness and acceptance processes in clients: Illuminating the theory and practice of change.
  12. Mohammadi L, 2015, SSUJ., 23, 853
  13. George B, 2015, Indian J Pos Psychol., 6, 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norouzi, M., Zargar, F., & Norouzi, F.
Affiliations
  • Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Norouzi, Mohadeseh
Venue
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Brieflands
Published
2017-05-21
Volume
11
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1735-8639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1735-9287
OpenAlex
W2614606592
Cited by
21
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, interpersonal problems, emotion regulation, emotional dysregulation, female university students, psychological intervention, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review