The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
Open accessAbstract
In a globalizing world, governments are not always able or willing to regulate the social and environmental externalities of global business activities. Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSI), defined as global institutions involving mainly corporations and civil society organizations, are one type of regulatory mechanism that tries to fill this gap by issuing soft law regulation. This conceptual paper examines the conditions of a legitimate transfer of regulatory power from traditional democratic nation-state processes to private regulatory schemes, such as MSIs. Democratic legitimacy is typically concerned with input legitimacy (rule credibility, or the extent to which the regulations are perceived as justified) and output legitimacy (rule effectiveness, or the extent to which the rules effectively solve the issues). In this study, we identify MSI input legitimacy criteria (inclusion, procedural fairness, consensual orientation, and transparency) and those of MSI output legitimacy (rule coverage, efficacy, and enforcement), and discuss their implications for MSI democratic legitimacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Habermas, J. (1996) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · Cited by 9,998
Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3278 · Cited by 7,136
Young, I. M. (2015) · Readings in Planning Theory · doi:10.1002/9781119084679.ch19 · Cited by 4,285
Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age
Bostaph, S., & Barber, B. R. (1985) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1059650 · Cited by 4,000
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
Sandel, M. J. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810152 · Cited by 3,903
Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity
Hamlyn, D. W., & Taylor, C. (1991) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3120882 · Cited by 3,723
Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?
Scharpf, F. (1999) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001 · Cited by 3,201
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3548 · Cited by 2,975
Hard and Soft Law in International Governance
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081800551280 · Cited by 2,812
Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies
Kitschelt, H. P. (1986) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712340000380x · Cited by 2,563
Cited by
The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1 · Cited by 1,537
Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2769-z · Cited by 451
Instrumental and/or deliberative? A typology of CSR communication tools
Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2282-9 · Cited by 202
Designing effective and equitable zero-deforestation supply chain policies
Grabs, J., Cammelli, F., Levy, S. A., & Garrett, R. D. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102357 · Cited by 95
Transnational corporations, biosphere stewardship, and sustainable futures
Österblom, H., Bebbington, J., Blasiak, R., Sobkowiak, M., & Folke, C. (2022) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-120120-052845 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Mena, S., & Palazzo, G.
- Venue
- Business Ethics Quarterly
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 527-556
- ISSN
- 1052-150X (ISSN-L)
- 2153-3326
- OpenAlex
- W2059573187
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 48.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5840/beq201222333
- The paper
- Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.