Cited by 95Oil Palm Production and SustainabilityConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact

Designing effective and equitable zero-deforestation supply chain policies

Open access
Grabs, Janina, Cammelli, Federico, Levy, Samuel A., Garrett, Rachael D.·2021·Global Environmental Change

Abstract

In response to the clearing of tropical forests for agricultural expansion, agri-food companies have adopted promises to eliminate deforestation from their supply chains in the form of ‘zero-deforestation commitments’ (ZDCs). While there is growing evidence about the environmental effectiveness of these commitments (i.e., whether they meet their conservation goals), there is little information on how they influence producers’ opportunity to access sustainable markets and related livelihood outcomes, or how design and implementation choices influence tradeoffs or potential synergies between effectiveness and equity in access. This paper explores these research gaps and makes three main contributions by: i) defining and justifying the importance of analyzing access equity and its relation to effectiveness when implementing forest-focused supply chain policies such as ZDCs, ii) identifying seven policy design principles that are likely to maximize synergies between effectiveness and access equity, and iii) assessing effectiveness-access equity tensions and synergies across common ZDC implementation mechanisms amongst the five largest firms in each of the leading agricultural forest-risk commodity sectors: palm oil, soybeans, beef cattle, and cocoa. To enhance forest conservation while avoiding harm to the most vulnerable farmers in the tropics, it is necessary to combine stringent rules with widespread capacity building, greater involvement of affected actors in the co-production of implementation mechanisms, and support for alternative rural development paths.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102357

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cattle ranching has long eluded sustainability initiatives such as private certification or public supply chain policies put in place to control its impacts.

    “Ranching has long eluded sustainability initiatives such as private certification or public supply chain policies put in place to control its impacts (Alix-Garcia and Gibbs, 2017;Grabs et al., 2021;Zu Ermgassen et al., 2020).”

    From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Grabs et al., 2021

    Section 5.5 (page unavailable) reports that two cattle supply-chain agreements in the Brazilian Amazon were not fully implemented and that assessments found limited or no effect for one of them. But section 5.6 discusses certification schemes for other commodities, not whether cattle ranching has eluded private certification. The evidence is also narrower than a general claim about ranching over time. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. Adhikari, B., Boag, G., 2013. Designing payments for ecosystem services schemes: some considerations. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability Terrestrial Systems 5 (1), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.11.001. · DOI
  2. Agergaard, J., Fold, N., Gough, K.V., 2009. Global-local interactions: socioeconomic and spatial dynamics in Vietnam's coffee frontier. Geographical J. 175, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00320.x. · DOI
  3. Alix-Garcia, J., Gibbs, H.K., 2017. Forest conservation effects of Brazil's zero deforestation cattle agreements undermined by leakage. Global Environ. Change 47, 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.009. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ansah, E.O., Kaplowitz, M.D., Lupi, F., Kerr, J., 2020. Smallholder participation and procedural compliance with sustainable cocoa certification programs. Agroecol. Sustainable Food Systems 44 (1), 54-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 21683565.2019.1579776. · DOI
  5. Atmadja, S., Verchot, L., 2012. A review of the state of research, policies and strategies in addressing leakage from reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob Change 17 (3), 311-336. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9328-4. · DOI
  6. Auld, G., Bernstein, S., Cashore, B., 2008. The new Corporate Social Responsibility. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 33 (1), 413-435.
  7. Bardach, E., Kagan, R.A., 1982. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
  8. Bennett, E.A., 2017. Who governs socially-oriented voluntary sustainability standards? Not the producers of certified products. World Dev. 91, 53-69. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.010. · DOI
  9. Brandi, C., Cabani, T., Hosang, C., Schirmbeck, S., Westermann, L., Wiese, H., 2015. Sustainability standards for palm oil: challenges for smallholder certification under the RSPO. J. Environ. Development 24 (3), 292-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1070496515593775. · DOI
  10. Brandi, C.A., 2017. Sustainability standards and sustainable development -synergies and trade-offs of transnational governance. Sustainable Development 25 (1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.v25.110.1002/sd.1639. · DOI
  11. Brown, K., Corbera, E., 2003. Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy. Climate Policy, Special Supplement on Climate Change and Sustainable Development 3, S41-S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. clipol.2003.10.004. · DOI
  12. Bush, S.R., Oosterveer, P., Bailey, M., Mol, A.P.J., 2015. Sustainability governance of chains and networks: a review and future outlook. J. Cleaner Prod. 107, 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.019. · DOI
  13. Byerlee, D., Falcon, W.P., Naylor, R.L., 2016. The Tropical Oil Crop Revolution: Food, Feed, Fuel, and Forests. Oxford University Press, OUP Catalogue.
  14. Cammelli, F., Garrett, R.D., Barlow, J., Parry, L., 2020. Fire risk perpetuates poverty and fire use among Amazonian smallholders. Global Environ. Change 63, 102096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102096. · DOI
  15. Cammelli, Federico, Levy, Samuel A., Grabs, Janina, Valentim, Judson, Garrett, Rachael D., 2021. Effectiveness-equity tradeoffs in enforcing forest-focused supply chain policies: lessons from the Amazonian cattle sector. [In Review]. https://doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.2.16282.77760. Submitted for publication. · DOI
  16. Carodenuto, S., 2019. Governance of zero deforestation cocoa in West Africa: New forms of public-private interaction. Environ. Policy Governance 29 (1), 55-66. https://doi. org/10.1002/eet.v29.110.1002/eet.1841. · DOI
  17. Chan, K.M.A., Anderson, E., Chapman, M., Jespersen, K., Olmsted, P., 2017. Payments for ecosystem services: rife with problems and potential-for transformation towards sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 140, 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2017.04.029. · DOI
  18. Cheyns, E., Silva-Castañeda, L., Aubert, P.-M., 2020. Missing the forest for the data? Conflicting valuations of the forest and cultivable lands. Land Use Policy 96, 103591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.042. · DOI
  19. Corbera, E., Kosoy, N., Martínez Tuna, M., 2007. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Meso-America. Global Environ. Change 17 (3-4), 365-380. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005. · DOI
  20. Curtis, P.G., Slay, C.M., Harris, N.L., Tyukavina, A., Hansen, M.C., 2018. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361 (6407), 1108-1111. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science:aau3445. · DOI
  21. Dauvergne, P., 2018. The global politics of the business of "sustainable" palm oil. Global Environmental Politics 18 (2), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00455. · DOI
  22. DeFries, R.S., Fanzo, J., Mondal, P., Remans, R., Wood, S.A., 2017. Is voluntary certification of tropical agricultural commodities achieving sustainability goals for small-scale producers? A review of the evidence. Environ. Res. Lett. 12 (3), 033001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa625e. · DOI
  23. Delabre, I., Boyd, E., Brockhaus, M., Carton, W., Krause, T., Newell, P., Wong, G.Y., Zelli, F., 2020. Unearthing the myths of global sustainable forest governance. Global Sustainability 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020. · DOI
  24. Dietz, T., Grabs, J., 2021. Additionality and implementation gaps in voluntary sustainability standards. New Political Economy 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13563467.2021.1881473. · DOI
  25. Dou, Y., da Silva, R.F.B., McCord, P., Zaehringer, J.G., Yang, H., Furumo, P.R., Zhang, J., Pizarro, J.C., Liu, J., 2020. Understanding how smallholders integrated into pericoupled and telecoupled systems. Sustainability 12, 1596. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su12041596. · DOI
  26. Folke, C., Österblom, H., Jouffray, J.-B., Lambin, E.F., Adger, W.N., Scheffer, M., Crona, B.I., Nyström, M., Levin, S.A., Carpenter, S.R., Anderies, J.M., Chapin, S., Crépin, A.- S., Dauriach, A., Galaz, V., Gordon, L.J., Kautsky, N., Walker, B.H., Watson, J.R., Wilen, J., de Zeeuw, A., 2020. An invitation for more research on transnational corporations and the biosphere. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1-1. doi: 10.1038/ s41559-020-1145-2. · DOI
  27. Furumo, P.R., Lambin, E.F., 2020. Scaling up zero-deforestation initiatives through public-private partnerships: a look inside post-conflict Colombia. Global Environ. Change 62, 102055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102055. · DOI
  28. Garrett, R.D, Carlson, K.M, Rueda, X., Noojipady, P., 2016. Assessing the potential additionality of certification by the Round table on Responsible Soybeans and the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. Environ. Res. Lett. 11 (4), 045003. https://doi. org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/045003. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Garrett, R.D., Lambin, E.F., Naylor, R.L., 2013. The new economic geography of land use change: supply chain configurations and land use in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 34, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.011. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Garrett, R.D., Levy, S., Carlson, K.M., Gardner, T.A., Godar, J., Clapp, J., Dauvergne, P., Heilmayr, R., le Polain de Waroux, Y., Ayre, B., Barr, R., Døvre, B., Gibbs, H.K., Hall, S., Lake, S., Milder, J.C., Rausch, L.L., Rivero, R., Rueda, X., Sarsfield, R., Soares-Filho, B., Villoria, N., 2019. Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments. Global Environ. Change 54, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2018.11.003. · DOI
  31. Garrett, R.D., Levy, S.A., Gollnow, F., Hodel, L., Rueda, X., 2021. Have food supply chain policies improved forest conservation and rural livelihoods? A systematic review. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 033002 https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000475417. · DOI
  32. Garrett, R.D., Rausch, L.L., 2016. Green for gold: social and ecological tradeoffs influencing the sustainability of the Brazilian soy industry. J. Peasant Studies 43 (2), 461-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1010077. · DOI
  33. Gaveau, D.L.A., Pirard, R., Salim, M.A., Tonoto, P., Yaen, H., Parks, S.A., Carmenta, R., 2017. Overlapping land claims limit the use of satellites to monitor no-deforestation commitments and no-burning compliance. Conserv. Lett. 10 (2), 257-264. https:// doi.org/10.1111/conl.12256. · DOI
  34. Gebara, M.F., 2013. Importance of local participation in achieving equity in benefit- sharing mechanisms for REDD+: a case study from the Juma Sustainable Development Reserve. Int. J. Commons 7, 473-497. https://doi.org/10.18352/ ijc.301. · DOI
  35. Gibbs, H.K., Munger, J., L'Roe, J., Barreto, P., Pereira, R., Christie, M., Amaral, T., Walker, N.F., 2016. Did ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conserv. Lett. 9 (1), 32-42. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/conl.12175. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Gill, D.A., Cheng, S.H., Glew, L., Aigner, E., Bennett, N.J., Mascia, M.B., 2019. Social synergies, tradeoffs, and equity in marine conservation impacts. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 44 (1), 347-372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110718- 032344. · DOI
  37. Goldman, E., Weisse, M., Harris, N., Schneider, M., 2020. Estimating the Role of Seven Commodities in Agriculture-Linked Deforestation: Oil Palm, Soy, Cattle, Wood Fiber, Cocoa, Coffee, and Rubber. WRI Publications. doi: 10.46830/writn.na.00001. · DOI
  38. Gollnow, F., Hissa, L. de B.V., Rufin, P., Lakes, T., 2018. Property-level direct and indirect deforestation for soybean production in the Amazon region of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Land Use Policy 78, 377-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landusepol.2018.07.010. · DOI
  39. Grabs, J., 2020. Selling Sustainability Short? The Private Governance of Labor and the Environment in the Coffee Sector. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  40. Grabs, J., Carodenuto, S.L., 2021. Traders as sustainability governance actors in global food supply chains: a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment 30 (2), 1314-1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.v30.210.1002/bse.2686. · DOI
  41. Haas, J.C., Loft, L., Pham, T.T., 2019. How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnam's payments for Forest Environmental Services Program. Ecol. Econ. 160, 205-214. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.021. · DOI
  42. Haggar, J., Soto, G., Casanoves, F., Virginio, E. de M., 2017. Environmental-economic benefits and trade-offs on sustainably certified coffee farms. Ecol. Ind. 79, 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.023. · DOI
  43. Haupt, F., König, S., Streck, C., Schulte, I., 2018b. Drivers of Change: How Effective are Corporate Supply-Chain Commitments? Analysis of the Brazilian Beef and Soy Sectors, and the Colombian Beef and Dairy Sector. Climate Focus, Washington, D.C. Heilmayr, R., Rausch, L.L., Munger, J., Gibbs, H.K., 2020. Brazil's Amazon Soy Moratorium reduced deforestation. Nature Food 1 (12), 801-810. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s43016-020-00194-5. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Jia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., Rueda, X., 2018. Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: an analysis of the literature. J. Cleaner Prod. 189, 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.248. · DOI
  45. Jung, S., Polasky, S., 2018. Partnerships to prevent deforestation in the Amazon. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 92, 498-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jeem.2018.11.001. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kalamandeen, M., Gloor, E., Mitchard, E., Quincey, D., Ziv, G., Spracklen, D., Spracklen, B., Adami, M., Aragão, L.E.O.C., Galbraith, D., 2018. Pervasive rise of small-scale deforestation in Amazonia. Sci. Rep. 8, 1600. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-018-19358-2. · DOI
  47. Kiser, L.L., Ostrom, E., 2000. The three worlds of action: A metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches, in: McGinnis, M.D. (Ed.), Polycentric Games and Institutions. Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 179-222.
  48. Klein, C., McKinnon, M.C., Wright, B.T., Possingham, H.P., Halpern, B.S., 2015. Social equity and the probability of success of biodiversity conservation. Global Environ. Change 35, 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.007. · DOI
  49. Klooster, Dan, 2005. Environmental certification of forests: the evolution of environmental governance in a commodity network. Journal of Rural Studies, Certifying Rural Spaces: Quality-Certified Products and Rural Governance 21 (4), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.005. · DOI
  50. Koberg, E., Longoni, A., 2019. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. J. Cleaner Prod. 207, 1084-1098. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033. · DOI
  51. Kroeger, A., Koenig, S., Thomson, A., Streck, C., 2017. Forest-and climate-smart cocoa in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana, Commodities Study. World Bank, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.1596/29014. · DOI
  52. Lambin, E.F., Gibbs, H.K., Heilmayr, R., Carlson, K.M., Fleck, L.C., Garrett, R.D., Waroux, Y. le P. de, McDermott, C.L., McLaughlin, D., Newton, P., Nolte, C., Pacheco, P., Rausch, L.L., Streck, C., Thorlakson, T., Walker, N.F., 2018. The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 8 (2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1. · DOI
  53. Larsen, R.K., Osbeck, M., Dawkins, E., Tuhkanen, H., Nguyen, H., Nugroho, A., Gardner, T.A., Zulfahm, Wolvekamp, P., 2018. Hybrid governance in agricultural commodity chains: insights from implementation of 'No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation' (NDPE) policies in the oil palm industry. J. Cleaner Prod. 183, 544-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.125. · DOI
  54. le Polain de Waroux, Y., Baumann, M., Gasparri, N.I., Gavier-Pizarro, G., Godar, J., Kuemmerle, T., Müller, R., Vázquez, F., Volante, J.N., Meyfroidt, P., 2018. Rents, actors, and the expansion of commodity frontiers in the Gran Chaco. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (1), 204-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 24694452.2017.1360761. · DOI
  55. Lee, J., Gereffi, G., Beauvais, J., 2012. Global value chains and agrifood standards: challenges and possibilities for smallholders in developing countries. PNAS 109 (31), 12326-12331. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913714108. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Lemeilleur, S., N', Y., Dao, N.A., Ruf, F., 2015. The productivist rationality behind a sustainable certification process: evidence from the Rainforest Alliance in the Ivorian cocoa sector. IJSD 18, 310. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2015.072661. · DOI
  57. Lister, J., Dauvergne, P., 2014. Voluntary zero net deforestation: the implications of demand-side retail sustainability for global forests. In: Nikolakis, W., Innes, J. (Eds.), Forests and Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. Routledge, London; New York.
  58. Loconto, A., Dankers, C., 2014. Impact of international voluntary standards on smallholder market participation in developing countries: A review of the literature. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  59. Lyons-White, J., Knight, A.T., 2018. Palm oil supply chain complexity impedes implementation of corporate no-deforestation commitments. Global Environ. Change 50, 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.012. · DOI
  60. Lyons-White, J., Pollard, E.H.B., Catalano, A.S., Knight, A.T., 2020. Rethinking zero deforestation beyond 2020 to more equitably and effectively conserve tropical forests. One Earth 3 (6), 714-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.11.007. · DOI
  61. McCubbins, M.D., Schwartz, T., 1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. Am. J. Political Sci. 28, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2110792. · DOI · Paper page
  62. McDermott, C.L., 2013. Certification and equity: Applying an "equity framework" to compare certification schemes across product sectors and scales. Environ. Sci. Policy 33, 428-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.008. · DOI
  63. McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., Schreckenberg, K., 2013. Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Policy 33, 416-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envsci.2012.10.006. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Mena, S., Palazzo, G., 2012. Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Bus. Ethics Q. 22 (3), 527-556. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222333. · DOI
  65. Meyfroidt, P., Boerner, J., Garrett, R., Gardner, T., Godar, J., Kis-Katos, K., Soares-Filho, B., Wunder, S., 2020. Focus on leakage and spillovers: informing land-use governance in a tele-coupled world. Environ. Res. Lett. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ ab7397. · DOI
  66. Newton, P., Benzeev, R., 2018. The role of zero-deforestation commitments in protecting and enhancing rural livelihoods. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Environmental change issues 2018 32, 126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.023. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 102 (6), 1366-1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00045608.2012.678040. · DOI
  68. Pascual, U., Phelps, J., Garmendia, E., Brown, K., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Gomez- Baggethun, E., Muradian, R., 2014. Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. Bioscience 64, 1027-1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146. · DOI
  69. Pereira, R., Rausch, L.L., Carrara, A., Gibbs, H.K., 2020. Extensive production practices and incomplete implementation hinder Brazil's Zero-Deforestation Cattle Agreements in Pará. Tropical Conservation Science 13, 1940082920942014. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1940082920942014. · DOI
  70. Pignataro, G., 2012. Equality of opportunity: policy and measurement paradigms. J. Econ. Surveys 26, 800-834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00679.x. · DOI
  71. Potapov, P., Hansen, M.C., Laestadius, L., Turubanova, S., Yaroshenko, A., Thies, C., Smith, W., Zhuravleva, I., Komarova, A., Minnemeyer, S., Esipova, E., 2017. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. 3 (1), e1600821. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600821. · DOI
  72. Prokopy, L.S., Floress, K., Klotthor-Weinkauf, D., Baumgart-Getz, A., 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. J. Soil Water Conserv. 63 (5), 300-311. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.5.300. · DOI
  73. Qaim, M., Sibhatu, K.T., Siregar, H., Grass, I., 2020. Environmental, economic, and social consequences of the oil palm boom. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 12 (1), 321-344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-024922. · DOI
  74. Roszkowska-Menkes, M., Aluchna, M., 2017. Institutional isomorphism and corporate social responsibility: towards a conceptual model. J. Positive Manage. 8, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2017.007. · DOI
  75. Russo Lopes, G., Bastos Lima, M.G., Reis, T.N.P. dos, 2021. Maldevelopment revisited: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion over Brazil's Cerrado in Matopiba. World Dev. 139, 105316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105316. · DOI · Paper page
  76. Schleifer, P., Sun, Y., 2018. Emerging markets and private governance: the political economy of sustainable palm oil in China and India. Rev. Int. Political Economy 25 (2), 190-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2017.1418759. · DOI
  77. Schoneveld, G C, Ekowati, D, Andrianto, A, van der Haar, S, 2019a. Modeling peat-and forestland conversion by oil palm smallholders in Indonesian Borneo. Environ. Res. Lett. 14 (1), 014006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf044. · DOI
  78. Schoneveld, G.C., van der Haar, S., Ekowati, D., Andrianto, A., Komarudin, H., Okarda, B., Jelsma, I., Pacheco, P., 2019b. Certification, good agricultural practice and smallholder heterogeneity: differentiated pathways for resolving compliance gaps in the Indonesian oil palm sector. Global Environ. Change 57, 101933. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101933. · DOI
  79. Senior, M., 2018. RSPO No Deforestation Consultancy: High Forest Cover Countries. Proforest, Oxford.
  80. Sorice, M.G., Donlan, C.J., Boyle, K.J., Xu, W., Gelcich, S., 2018. Scaling participation in payments for ecosystem services programs. PLOS ONE 13, e0192211. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192211. · DOI
  81. ten Kate, A., Kuepper, B., Piotrowski, M., 2020. NDPE Policies Cover 83% of Palm Oil Refineries; Implementation at 78%. Chain Reaction Research, Washington, D.C. Thorlakson, T., Zegher, J.F. de, Lambin, E.F., 2018. Companies' contribution to sustainability through global supply chains. PNAS 115 (9), 2072-2077. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1716695115. · DOI
  82. Tröster, R., Hiete, M., 2018. Success of voluntary sustainability certification schemes -a comprehensive review. J. Cleaner Prod. 196, 1034-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.05.240. · DOI
  83. zu Ermgassen, E.K.H.J., Ayre, B., Godar, J., Lima, M.G.B., Bauch, S., Garrett, R., Green, J., Lathuillière, M.J., Löfgren, P., MacFarquhar, C., Meyfroidt, P., Suavet, C., West, C., Gardner, T., 2020. Using supply chain data to monitor zero deforestation commitments: an assessment of progress in the Brazilian soy sector. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 035003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6497. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grabs, J., Cammelli, F., Levy, S. A., & Garrett, R. D.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Grabs, Janina
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
70
Pages
102357
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198878093
Cited by
95
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • National Science Foundation
  • Boston University
  • European Research Council
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Keywords
zero-deforestation commitments, supply chain policy, equitable access, tropical forest conservation, agri-food companies, palm oil, soybean, beef cattle, Theobroma cacao, vulnerable farmers, capacity building, stakeholder co-production, deforestation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review