CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Listeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyAtmospheric-Pressure Plasma ApplicationsMicrobial Inactivation Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

3D Printing of Materials and Printing Parameters with Animal Resources: A Review

Open access
Jeon, Eun Young, Kim, Yuri, Yun, Hyun-Jung, Kim, Bum-Keun, Choi, Yun-Sang·2024·Food Science of Animal Resources
DOI 10.5851/kosfa.2023.e73PMC PMC11097027
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the bactericidal effect of nisin (Nisin) only, atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) only, and a combination of APP and nisin (APP+Nisin) on beef jerky and sliced ham inoculated with Escherichia coli O157:H7, gram-negative bacteria. The bactericidal effect against E. coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes was confirmed using a nisin solution at a concentration of 0–100 ppm, and APP+Nisin was tested on beef jerky and sliced ham using 100 ppm nisin. Beef jerky and sliced ham were treated with APP for 5 min and 9 min, respectively. In the bacterial solution, 100 ppm nisin out of 0–100 ppm nisin exhibited the highest bactericidal activity against L. monocytogenes (gram-positive bacteria; p<0.05); however, it did not exhibit bactericidal effects against E. coli O157:H7 (gram-negative bacteria). The APP+Nisin exhibited a 100% reduction rate in both E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes compared to the control group, and was more effective than the Nisin. The APP+Nisin decreased the number of colonies formed by 0.80 and 1.96 Log CFU/g for beef jerky and sliced ham, respectively, compared to the control, and exhibited a higher bactericidal effect compared to the Nisin (p<0.05). These results demonstrate the synergistic bactericidal effect of APP and nisin, providing a possible method to improve the limitations of nisin against gram-negative bacteria. In addition, this technology has the potential to be applied to various meats and meat products to control surface microorganisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5851/kosfa.2023.e73

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Adedeji, 2022, Three-dimensional printing of wheat flour and Acheta domesticus powder blends, Int J Food Sci Technol, 57, 6279, 10.1111/ijfs.15707 · DOI
  2. Anukiruthika, 2020, 3D printing of egg yolk and white with rice flour blends, J Food Eng, 265, 109691, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109691 · DOI
  3. Bareen, 2021, Assessment of 3D printability of heat acid coagulated milk semi-solids ‘soft cheese’ by correlating rheological, microstructural, and textural properties, J Food Eng, 300, 110506, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110506 · DOI
  4. Carvajal-Mena, 2022, Valorization of salmon industry by-products: Evaluation of salmon skin gelatin as a biomaterial suitable for 3D food printing, LWT-Food Sci Technol, 155, 112931, 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112931 · DOI
  5. Chao, 2022, Coaxial 3D printing of chicken surimi incorporated with mealworm protein isolate as texture-modified food for the elderly, J Food Eng, 333, 111151, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111151 · DOI
  6. Chen, 2022, Improving 3D/4D printing characteristics of natural food gels by novel additives: A review, Food Hydrocoll, 123, 107160, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107160 · DOI
  7. Cheng, 2022, Rheology of edible food inks from 2D/3D/4D printing, and its role in future 5D/6D printing, Food Hydrocoll, 132, 107855, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107855 · DOI
  8. Dick, 2020, Feasibility study of hydrocolloid incorporated 3D printed pork as dysphagia food, Food Hydrocoll, 107, 105940, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105940 · DOI
  9. Dick, 2019, Post-processing feasibility of composite-layer 3D printed beef, Meat Sci, 153, 9, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.024 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dick, 2021, Printability and textural assessment of modified-texture cooked beef pastes for dysphagia patients, Future Foods, 3, 100006, 10.1016/j.fufo.2020.100006 · DOI
  11. Dick, 2021, The role of hydrocolloids on the 3D printability of meat products, Food Hydrocoll, 119, 106879, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106879 · DOI
  12. Du, 2021, Effect of whey protein on the 3D printing performance of konjac hybrid gel, LWT-Food Sci Technol, 140, 110716, 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110716 · DOI
  13. Fan, 2022, Structural characterization and fluidness analysis of lactose/whey protein isolate composite hydrocolloids as printing materials for 3D printing, Food Res Int, 152, 110908, 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110908 · DOI
  14. Fan, 2020, Effect of microwave-salt synergetic pre-treatment on the 3D printing performance of spi-strawberry ink system, LWT-Food Sci Technol, 122, 109004, 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.109004 · DOI
  15. Hao, 2010, Material characterisation and process development for chocolate additive layer manufacturing, Virtual Phys Prototyp, 5, 57, 10.1080/17452751003753212 · DOI
  16. Jiang, 2020, Extrusion 3D printing of polymeric materials with advanced properties, Adv Sci, 7, 2001379, 10.1002/advs.202001379 · DOI
  17. Joshi, 2021, Assessment of 3D printability of composite dairy matrix by correlating with its rheological properties, Food Res Int, 141, 110111, 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110111 · DOI
  18. Kim, 2017, Classification of the printability of selected food for 3D printing: Development of an assessment method using hydrocolloids as reference material, J Food Eng, 215, 23, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.07.017 · DOI
  19. Liu, 2019, 3D printing complex egg white protein objects: Properties and optimization, Food Bioproc Tech, 12, 267, 10.1007/s11947-018-2209-z · DOI
  20. Liu, 2019, Rheological and mechanical behavior of milk protein composite gel for extrusion-based 3D food printing, LWT-Food Sci Technol, 102, 338, 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.12.053 · DOI
  21. Liu, 2019, Linking rheology and printability of a multicomponent gel system of carrageenan-xanthan-starch in extrusion based additive manufacturing, Food Hydrocoll, 87, 413, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.08.026 · DOI
  22. Liu, 2017, 3D printing: Printing precision and application in food sector, Trends Food Sci Technol, 69, 83, 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.018 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Liu, 2018, Impact of rheological properties of mashed potatoes on 3D printing, J Food Eng, 220, 76, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.017 · DOI
  24. Mulkern, 2020, International dysphagia diet standardization initiative and dietetic professionals
  25. Pant, 2021, 3D food printing of fresh vegetables using food hydrocolloids for dysphagic patients, Food Hydrocoll, 114, 106546, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106546 · DOI
  26. Réhault-Godbert, 2019, The golden egg: Nutritional value, bioactivities, and emerging benefits for human health, Nutrients, 11, 684, 10.3390/nu11030684 · DOI
  27. Riantiningtyas, 2021, 3D printing of a high protein yoghurt-based gel: Effect of protein enrichment and gelatine on physical and sensory properties, Food Res Int, 147, 110517, 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110517 · DOI
  28. Ross, 2019, Potential applications of dairy products, ingredients and formulations in 3D printing, 175, 10.1016/B978-0-12-814564-7.00007-9 · DOI
  29. Severini, 2018, On printability, quality and nutritional properties of 3D printed cereal based snacks enriched with edible insects, Food Res Int, 106, 666, 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.034 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Severini, 2016, Could the 3D printing technology be a useful strategy to obtain customized nutrition?, J Clin Gastroenterol, 50, S175, 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000705 · DOI
  31. Sun, 2015, An overview of 3D printing technologies for food fabrication, Food Bioproc Tech, 8, 1605, 10.1007/s11947-015-1528-6 · DOI · Paper page
  32. van Huis, 2013, Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security, Annu Rev Entomol, 58, 563, 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 · DOI
  33. Wang, 2021, Development of rheologically stable high internal phase emulsions by gelatin/chitooligosaccharide mixtures and food application, Food Hydrocoll, 121, 107050, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107050 · DOI
  34. Wilson, 2020, Customized shapes for chicken meat–based products: Feasibility study on 3D-printed nuggets, Food Bioproc Tech, 13, 1968, 10.1007/s11947-020-02537-3 · DOI
  35. Xu, 2020, Effect of novel ultrasonic-microwave combined pretreatment on the quality of 3D printed wheat starch-papaya system, Food Biophys, 15, 249, 10.1007/s11483-019-09615-w · DOI
  36. Xu, 2020, Impact of thermal treatment on the rheological, microstructural, protein structures and extrusion 3D printing characteristics of egg yolk, Food Hydrocoll, 100, 105399, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105399 · DOI
  37. Yang, 2018, Physical properties of 3D printed baking dough as affected by different compositions, Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 49, 202, 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.01.001 · DOI
  38. Yang, 2022, Optimizing 3D printing of chicken meat by response surface methodology and genetic algorithm: Feasibility study of 3D printed chicken product, LWT-Food Sci Technol, 154, 112693, 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112693 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Jeon, E. Y., Kim, Y., Yun, H.-J., Kim, B.-K., & Choi, Y.-S.
Affiliations
  • Korea Food Research Institute (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
ORCID
Venue
Food Science of Animal Resources
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-03
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
225-238
ISSN
  • 2636-0772 (ISSN-L)
  • 2636-0780
DOI
10.5851/kosfa.2023.e73
PMC
PMC11097027
OpenAlex
W4382322568
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Food Science of Animal Resources (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Korea Food Research Institute (E0211200-03)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
Keywords
nisin, atmospheric pressure plasma, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, synergistic bactericidal effect, beef jerky, sliced ham, antimicrobial peptides, meat safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review