Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 644

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computational philosophy of science

·1989·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Philosophy of science attempts to describe all parts of the scientific process in a general way in order to facilitate the description, execution and improvements of this process.So far, all proposed philosophies have only covered existing processes and disciplines partially and imperfectly.In particular logical approaches have always received a lot of attention due to attempts to fundamentally address issues with the definition of science as a discipline with reductionist theories.We propose a new way to approach the problem from the perspective of computational complexity and argue why this approach may be better than previous propositions based on pure logic and mathematics.Many scientists call for distinguishing computational science as a new kind of science (Wolfram 2002;Angius, Primiero, and Turner 2021).It is extremely important to provide a sensible philosophical definition of computational science since the discipline is rooted in disciplines of data science and empirical modelling of nature.The search for a satisfactory definition leads us to a new approach to the philosophy of science.It suggests that computational science may not be a new formal method of program construction but also a new approach to the philosophy of science itself.And indeed allows us to generalization of philosophy of science in a much more satisfactory way than many efforts to date(

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.26-2691

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 644

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1989-01-01
Volume
26
Issue
05
Pages
26-2691-26-2691
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2075725716
Cited by
644
References
5
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational philosophy of science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.26-2691
The paper
Computational philosophy of science. (1989). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.26-2691

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.