The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How children think and learn
Abstract
From Pavlov to Piaget images of childhood stages of development? learning how to think and learn language and learning making sense the literate mind the mathematical mind education and educability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,071
On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom: Reappraisal of a Century of Research
Whiten, A., & Ham, R. (1992) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60146-1 · Cited by 732
The Metaphor of Scaffolding: Its Utility for the Field of Learning Disabilities
Stone, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949803100404 · Cited by 465
Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship
Kneebone, R. L., Scott, W., Darzi, A., & Horrocks, M. (2004) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01959.x · Cited by 422
Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial
Alexander, R. (2018) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1989-06-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 26-5933-26-5933
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1594478139
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How children think and learn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.26-5933
- The paper
- How children think and learn. (1989). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.26-5933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
