The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nested games: rational choice in comparative politics
Abstract
List of Figures List of Tables Acknowledgments 1. Nested Games and Rationality 2. In Defense of the Rational-Choice Approach Appendix to Chapter 2 3. Two-Person Games with Variable Payoffs Appendix to Chapter 3: A Appendix to Chapter 3: B 4* Games with Variable Rules, or the Politics of Institutional Change 5. Why Do British Labour Party Activists Commit Political Suicide? Appendix to Chapter 5 6. A Rational-Choice Approach to Consociationalism 7. The Cohesion of French Electoral Coalitions Appendix to Chapter 7 8. Conclusions Bibliography Index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Politics of Authoritarian Rule
Svolik, M. W. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139176040 · Cited by 2,611
Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe
Sweet, A. S. (2000) · doi:10.1093/0198297718.001.0001 · Cited by 855
The Psychology of Group Conflict and the Dynamics of Oppression: A Social Dominance Perspective
Sidanius, J. (1993) · Explorations in Political Psychology · doi:10.1215/9780822396697-009 · Cited by 365
Institutionalization and Peronism: The Concept, the Case and the Case for Unpacking the Concept
Levitsky, S. (1998) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068898004001004 · Cited by 309
(2016) · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1990-09-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 28-0532-28-0532
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1571072200
- Cited by
- 1,336
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nested games: rational choice in comparative politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.28-0532
- The paper
- Nested games: rational choice in comparative politics. (1990). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-0532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
