The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Citizenship and community: civic republicanism and the modern world
Abstract
1. Introduction Part I Citizenship and Community: An Analytical Statement 2. The Citizen in the Political Community Part II Citizenship and Community in the Civic-Republican Tradition 3. Machiavelli: Citizenship and Glory 4. Rousseau: Freedom, Virtue and Happiness 5. Hegel: Rational Freedom in the Ethical Community 6. Toqueville: Citizenship in Town and State Part III Citizenship and Community in the Modern World 7. The Modern Relevance of the Civic-Republican Tradition 8. Citizenship in Modern Democratic Theory
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x · Cited by 1,941
Contemporary Discourses of Citizenship
Abowitz, K. K., & Harnish, J. (2006) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543076004653 · Cited by 587
The Problems of Communitarian Politics: Unity and Conflict
Frazer, E. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198295642.001.0001 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1991-04-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 28-4776-28-4776
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2077831202
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Citizenship and community: civic republicanism and the modern world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.28-4776
- The paper
- Citizenship and community: civic republicanism and the modern world. (1991). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-4776
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
