The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feminist methods in social research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiential Perspective
Patton, M. Q. (2002) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/1473325002001003636 · Cited by 2,564
Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures
Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M.-Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M. (2001) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/02601370120490 · Cited by 1,134
UNDERSTANDING PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OPTION
MacDonald, C. (2012) · The Canadian Journal of Action Research · doi:10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37 · Cited by 852
The reflexive interview and a performative social science
Denzin, N. K. (2001) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/146879410100100102 · Cited by 831
Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology: Conceptual Foundations
Morrow, S. L. (2007) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006286990 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 30-1811-30-1811
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4302798420
- Cited by
- 1,472
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminist methods in social research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-1811
- The paper
- Feminist methods in social research. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-1811
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
