The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Children talking television: the making of television literacy
Abstract
What are words worth? interpreting children's talk about television family viewing - text and context retelling stories - versions of narrative the self and others - reading television people beyond the magic window - children's judgments of the reality of television hidden persuaders? advertiziong, resistance and pleasure television, language and learning - implications for media education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203979402 · Cited by 1,749
The seven great debates in the media literacy movement
Hobbs, R. (1998) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/48.1.16 · Cited by 499
Defining digital literacy – What do young people need to know about digital media?
Buckingham, D. (2006) · Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy · doi:10.18261/issn1891-943x-2006-04-03 · Cited by 403
Critical media literacy is not an option
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007) · Learning Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11519-007-0004-2 · Cited by 366
Kong, S.-C., Man-Yin Cheung, W., & Zhang, G. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100026 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1993-12-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 31-2224-31-2224
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W291333529
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children talking television: the making of television literacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-2224
- The paper
- Children talking television: the making of television literacy. (1993). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-2224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
