Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The seven great debates in the media literacy movement

Hobbs, R·1998·Journal of Communication
DOI 10.1093/joc/48.1.16
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Journal Article The Seven Great Debates in the Media Literacy Movement Get access Renée Hobbs Renée Hobbs 1Babson College and Clark University's Hiatt Center for Urban Education Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Communication, Volume 48, Issue 1, March 1998, Pages 16–32, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02734.x Published: 07 February 2006

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/joc/48.1.16

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Hobbs, R.
Venue
Journal of Communication
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
16-32
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
DOI
10.1093/joc/48.1.16
OpenAlex
W2165690534
Cited by
499
References
13
FWCI
45.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The seven great debates in the media literacy movement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/joc/48.1.16
The paper
Hobbs, R. (1998). The seven great debates in the media literacy movement. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/48.1.16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.