The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Downcast eyes: the denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought
Abstract
Long considered 'the noblest of the senses', vision has increasingly come under critical scrutiny by a wide range of thinkers who question its dominance in Western culture. These critics of vision, especially prominent in twentieth-century France, have challenged its allegedly superior capacity to provide access to the world. They have also criticized its supposed complicity with political and social oppression through the promulgation of spectacle and surveillance. Martin Jay turns to this discourse surrounding vision and explores its often contradictory implications in the work of such influential figures as Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan, Louis Althusser, Guy Debord, Luce Irigaray, Emmanuel Levinas, and Jacques Derrida. Jay begins with a discussion of the theory of vision from Plato to Descartes, then considers its role in the French Enlightenment before turning to its status in the culture of modernity. From consideration of French Impressionism to analysis of Georges Bataille and the Surrealists, Roland Barthes' writings on photography, and the film theory of Christian Metz, Jay provides lucid and fair-minded accounts of thinkers and ideas widely known for their difficulty. His book examines the myriad links between the interrogation of vision and the pervasive antihumanist, antimodernist, and counter-enlightenment tenor of much recent French thought. Refusing, however, to defend the dominant visual order, he calls instead for a plurality of 'scopic regimes'. Certain to generate controversy and discussion throughout the humanities and social sciences, Downcast Eyes will consolidate Jay's reputation as one of today's premier cultural and intellectual historians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State
Torpey, J. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520990 · Cited by 1,005
Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences
Brighenti, A. (2007) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392107076079 · Cited by 675
Surveillance and capture: Two models of privacy
Agre, P. E. (1994) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.1994.9960162 · Cited by 401
(2011) · Cited by 368
What else? some more ways of thinking and doing ‘Children's Geographies’
Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2006) · Children's Geographies · doi:10.1080/14733280600577459 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 31-3594-31-3594
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2023403023
- Cited by
- 1,502
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Downcast eyes: the denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-3594
- The paper
- Downcast eyes: the denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-3594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.