Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 535

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton

·1994·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

1. Introduction.- I. The Site.- 2. Geologic setting and age.- 3. Microstratigraphy and paleoenvironments.- 4. Taphonomy.- 5. The faunal context.- II. The Specimen.- 6. The skull.- 7. The postcranial bones.- 8. The dentition.- III. Analytical Studies.- 9. The physiological age of KNM-WT 15000.- 10. The reconstruction of the pelvis.- 11. Body size and body shape.- 12. The thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.- 13. The rib cage.- 14. The endocast.- 15. The vertebral canal.- 16. A morphometric study of facial growth.- 17. Perspectives on the nariokotome discovery.- A note on accession numbers.- The preparation and Casting of the specimen.- References.- Acknowledgments.- Contributors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.31-4449

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 535

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1994-04-01
Volume
31
Issue
08
Pages
31-4449-31-4449
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1603594291
Cited by
535
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-4449
The paper
The Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-4449

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.