The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Medical talk and medical work: the liturgy of the clinic
Abstract
Introduction Work among the Haematologists The Sociological Construction of Medicine The Production of Medical Knowledge Reading the Body Constructing Cases Voicing Opinion Voices of Medicine Conclusion
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
Perneger, T. V. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236 · Cited by 5,900
Ensuring rigour in qualitative research
Seale, C. (1997) · The European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/7.4.379 · Cited by 583
Oudshoorn, N. (2008) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01032.x · Cited by 280
Lingard, L., Reznick, R., DeVito, I., & Espin, S. (2002) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01271.x · Cited by 270
A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity
Lingard, L., Garwood, K., Schryer, C. F., & Spafford, M. M. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00057-6 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 33-4533-33-4533
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W419061338
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical talk and medical work: the liturgy of the clinic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.33-4533
- The paper
- Medical talk and medical work: the liturgy of the clinic. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-4533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
