Cited by 270Innovations in Medical EducationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEmpathy and Medical Education

A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity

Lingard, L, Garwood, K, Schryer, C.F, Spafford, M.M·2003·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Healthcare professionals use the genre of case presentation to communicate among themselves the salient patient information during treatment and management. In case presentation, many uncertainties surface, regarding, e.g., the reliability of patient reports, the sensitivity of laboratory tests, and the boundaries of scientific knowledge. The management and portrayal of uncertainty is a critical aspect of professional discourse. This paper documents the rhetorical features of certainty and uncertainty in novice case presentations, considering their pragmatic and problematic implications for students' professional socialization. This study was conducted during the third-year inpatient clerkship at a tertiary care, pediatric hospital in hospital in Canada. Data collection included: (1) non-participant observations of 19 student case presentations involving 11 student and 10 faculty participants, and (2) individual interviews with 11 students and 10 faculty participants. A grounded theory approach informed data collection and analysis. Five thematic categories emerged, two of which this paper considers in detail: "Thinking as a Student" and "Thinking as a Doctor". Within these categories, the management and portrayal of uncertainty was a recurrent issue. Teachers modeled central features of a "professional rhetoric of uncertainty", managing uncertainty of six origins: limits of individual knowledge, limits of evidence, limitless possibility, limits of patient's/parent's account, limits of professional agreement, and limits of scientific knowledge. By contrast, students demonstrated a "novice rhetoric of uncertainty", represented by their focus on responding to personal knowledge deficits through the strategies of acknowledgement, argument, and deflection. Some students moved towards the professional rhetoric of uncertainty, suggesting not only advances in communication, but also shifts in attitude towards patients and colleagues, that were interpreted as indications that this rhetoric shapes professional identity and interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00057-6

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lingard, L., Garwood, K., Schryer, C. F., & Spafford, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Lingard, L
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
603-616
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049123729
Cited by
270
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
case presentation, uncertainty, professional identity, medical students, professional socialization, professional rhetoric, medical education, clinical communication, limits of knowledge, limits of evidence, children's hospitals
MeSH terms
Attitude, Canada, Clinical Clerkship, Clinical Competence, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Medical History Taking, Medical Records, Pediatrics, Self Disclosure, Sociology, Medical, Students, Medical, Thinking, Interdisciplinary Communication, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review