The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New social movements in Western Europe: a comparative analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Sociology of the Radical Right
Rydgren, J. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131752 · Cited by 874
Is extreme right‐wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family
Rydgren, J. (2005) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00233.x · Cited by 717
A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs
REIMANN, K. D. (2006) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00392.x · Cited by 441
Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328525 · Cited by 429
“Get up, Stand up”: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements
Taylor, V., & Van dyke, N. (2007) · The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements · doi:10.1002/9780470999103.ch12 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 34-0634-34-0634
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4299506735
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New social movements in Western Europe: a comparative analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.34-0634
- The paper
- New social movements in Western Europe: a comparative analysis. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-0634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
