The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The alliance revolution: the new shape of business rivalry
Abstract
More than we ever anticipated, alliances among firms are changing the way business is conducted, particularly in the global, high-technology sector. The reasons are clear: companies must increasingly pool their capabilities to succeed in ever more complex and rapidly changing businesses. But the consequences for managers and for the economy have so far been underestimated. In this book, Benjamin Gomes-Casseres presents an in-depth account of the new world of business alliances and shows how has become part of the very fabric of modern competition. Alliances, he argues, create new units of competition that do battle with one another and with traditional single firms. The flexible capabilities of these multifirm constellations give them advantages over single firms in certain contexts, offsetting the advantage of a single firm's unified control. When managed effectively, alliances can strengthen a firm's competitive advantage and narrow the gap between leading firms and second-tier players. This often results in intensified rivalry, and the competition within an industry is transformed. Alliances often spread swiftly through an industry as firms jockey for advantage. Yet the very spread of alliances increases their costs and poses new limits on their use. Gomes-Casseres concludes that firms need to manage their constellations to enchance within their groups, while raising what he calls barriers to collaboration for rivals. These ideas are developed and illustrated through case studies of alliances among US, Japanese and European firms in electronics and computers, including Xerox, IBM and Fujitsu as well as other small and large companies. The book should be of interest to business academics, managers and general readers concerned with contemporary capitalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00037-9 · Cited by 2,750
Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500307 · Cited by 1,364
Capaldo, A. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.621 · Cited by 986
Learning from Failure: Towards an Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures
Ariño, A., & de la Torre, J. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.3.306 · Cited by 976
Takeishi, A. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.164 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-12-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 34-2251-34-2251
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1532003054
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The alliance revolution: the new shape of business rivalry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.34-2251
- The paper
- The alliance revolution: the new shape of business rivalry. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-2251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.