The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The inclusion of the other: studies in political theory
Abstract
edited by Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff Since its appearance in English translation in 1996, JA rgen Habermas's Between Facts and Norms has become the focus of a productive dialogue between German and Anglo-American legal and political theorists. The present volume contains ten essays that provide an overview of Habermas's political thought since the original appearance of Between Facts and Norms in 1992 and extend his model of deliberative democracy in novel ways to issues untreated in the earlier work.Habermas's theory of democracy has at least three features that set it apart from competing positions. First, it combines a concern with questions of normative justification with an empirical analysis of the social conditions necessary for the realization of democratic institutions. Second, at the heart of his model is the assertion of an internal relationship between liberalism and democracy. On this account, the rights of the individual that are central to liberalism can be guaranteed only within a constitutional framework that at the same time fosters democratic rights of political participation through the public sphere. Finally, Habermas defends a conception of universal human rights that is not only sensitive to cultural differences but also calls for legal and political institutions that facilitate the cultivation of cultural and religious identities within pluralistic societies.These essays demonstrate the extraordinary power of Habermas's theory of democracy through a further engagement with Rawls's political liberalism and through original contributions to current debates over nationalism, multiculturalism, and the viability of supranational political institutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x · Cited by 2,131
The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference
Mignolo, W. D. (2002) · South Atlantic Quarterly · doi:10.1215/00382876-101-1-57 · Cited by 1,243
How can we trust our fellow citizens?
Offe, C. (1999) · Democracy and Trust · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511659959.003 · Cited by 698
Cyborg Urbanization: Complexity and Monstrosity in the Contemporary City
GANDY, M. (2005) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00568.x · Cited by 469
Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2769-z · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 36-5955-36-5955
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1974686676
- Cited by
- 1,705
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The inclusion of the other: studies in political theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.36-5955
- The paper
- The inclusion of the other: studies in political theory. (1999). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-5955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.