Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,704

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Women and human development: the capabilities approach

·2000·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Women in much of the world lack support for fundamental functions of a human life.They are less well nourished than men, less healthy, more vulnerable to physical violence and sexual abuse.They are much less likely than men to be literate, and still less likely to have preprofessional or technical education.Should they attempt to enter the workplace, they face greater obstacles, including intimidation from family or spouse, sex discrimination in hiring, and sexual harassment in the workplace -all, frequently, without effective legal recourse.Similar obstacles often impede their effective participation in political life.In many nations women are not full equals under the law: they do not have the same property rights as men, the same rights to make a contract, the same rights of association, mobility, and religious liberty. 1 Burdened, often, with the ''double day'' of taxing employment and full responsibility for housework and child care, they lack opportunities for play and for the cultivation of their imaginative and cognitive faculties.All these factors take their toll on emotional well-being: women have fewer opportunities than men to live free from fear and to enjoy rewarding types of love -especially when, as often happens, they are married without choice in childhood and have no recourse from bad marriages.In all these ways, unequal social and political circumstances give women unequal human capabilities.1 For examples of these inequalities, see Chapter 3, and my ''Religion and Women's

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.38-0369

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,704

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
38
Issue
01
Pages
38-0369-38-0369
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1761052593
Cited by
3,704
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women and human development: the capabilities approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.38-0369
The paper
Women and human development: the capabilities approach. (2000). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-0369

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.