Cited by 2,166Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHealth, psychology, and well-beingQuality of Life Measurement

The challenge of defining wellbeing

Open access
Dodge, Rachel, Daly, Annette, Huyton, Jan, Sanders, Lalage·2012·International Journal of Wellbeing

Abstract

Wellbeing is a growing area of research, yet the question of how it should be defined remains unanswered.This multi-disciplinary review explores past attempts to define wellbeing and provides an overview of the main theoretical perspectives, from the work of Aristotle to the present day.The article argues that many attempts at expressing its nature have focused purely on dimensions of wellbeing, rather than on definition.Among these theoretical perspectives, we highlight the pertinence of dynamic equilibrium theory of wellbeing (Headey & Wearing, 1989), the effect of life challenges on homeostasis (Cummins, 2010) and the lifespan model of development (Hendry & Kloep, 2002).Consequently, we conclude that it would be appropriate for a new definition of wellbeing to centre on a state of equilibrium or balance that can be affected by life events or challenges.The article closes by proposing this new definition, which we believe to be simple, universal in application, optimistic and a basis for measurement.This definition conveys the multi-faceted nature of wellbeing and can help individuals and policy makers move forward in their understanding of this popular term.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dodge, R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L.
Affiliations
Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Dodge, Rachel
Venue
International Journal of Wellbeing
Published
2012-08-28
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
222-235
ISSN
1179-8602 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4250386232
Cited by
2,166
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 126 · 2025: 158 · 2024: 227 · 2023: 252 · 2022: 281 · 2021: 291 · 2020: 223 · 2019: 177 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 13
FWCI
54.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • International Journal of Wellbeing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
well-being, homeostasis, life problems, lifespan development, Aristotle, well-being measurement, life events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review