The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reworking the student departure puzzle
Abstract
More than a quarter of the students who enter four-year institutions and half of those who enter two-year schools depart at the end of their first year. This phenomenon is known as the departure puzzle, and for years, the most important body of work on student retention has come from sociologist Vincent Tinto. In Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle, leading scholars of the college student experience - including Tinto himself - reevaluate Tinto's interactionalist perspective, which holds that students unable to connect with either the academic or social subsystems of their institutions are likely to leave. Recent critiques of this theory have indicated the need for either its serious revision or the development of a new theory altogether. The contributors to this volume offer a variety of both theoretical and methodological perspectives on student departure, with additional chapters covering minority student retention, the link between college choice and student persistence, and the effect of the classroom experience on the student's choice. The recommendations made here will not only reinvigorate research on this important topic but will also lead administrators to better mana
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE OF STUDENT RETENTION: WHAT NEXT?
Tinto, V. (2006) · Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice · doi:10.2190/4ynu-4tmb-22dj-an4w · Cited by 1,936
Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197 · Cited by 1,108
Faculty do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement
Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1 · Cited by 1,048
Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116 · Cited by 1,840
Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes
Walpole, M. (2003) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.2003.0044 · Cited by 751
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 38-6319-38-6319
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2139804199
- Cited by
- 1,192
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reworking the student departure puzzle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.38-6319
- The paper
- Reworking the student departure puzzle. (2001). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-6319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.