The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Handbook of early literacy research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x · Cited by 2,555
What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension.
Ouellette, G. P. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554 · Cited by 1,027
Added value of dialogic parent–child book readings: A meta-analysis
Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., de Jong, M. T., & Smeets, D. J. H. (2008) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409280701838603 · Cited by 973
Touch your toes! Developing a direct measure of behavioral regulation in early childhood.
Cameron Ponitz, C. E., McClelland, M. M., Jewkes, A. M., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., & Morrison, F. J. (2008) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.01.004 · Cited by 635
Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., & de Jong, M. T. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654309332561 · Cited by 635
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 39-2923-39-2923
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4206042313
- Cited by
- 1,119
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handbook of early literacy research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.39-2923
- The paper
- Handbook of early literacy research. (2002). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-2923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
