The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative biomechanics: life's physical world
Abstract
Why do you shift from walking to running at a particular speed? How can we predict transition speeds for animals of different sizes? Why must the flexible elastic of arterial walls behave differently than a rubber tube or balloon? How do leaves manage to expose a broad expanse of surface while suffering only a small fraction of the drag of flags in high winds? The field of biomechanics - how living things move and work - hasn't seen a new general textbook in more than two decades. Here a leading investigator and teacher lays out the key concepts of biomechanics using examples drawn from throughout the plant and animal kingdoms. Up-to-date and comprehensive, this is also the only book to give thorough coverage to both major subfields of biomechanics: fluid and solid mechanics. Steven Vogel explains how biomechanics makes use of models and methods drawn from physics and mechanical engineering to investigate a wide range of general questions - from how animals swim and fly and the modes of terrestrial locomotion to the way organisms respond to wind and water currents and the operation of circulatory and suspension-feeding systems. He looks also at the relationships between the properties of biological materials - spider silk, jellyfish jelly, muscle, and more - and their various structural and functional roles. While written primarily for biology majors and graduate students in biology, this text will be useful for physical scientists and engineers seeking a sense of the state of the art of biomechanics and a guide to its rather scattered literature. For a still wider audience, it establishes the basic biological context for such applied areas as ergonomics, orthopedics, mechanical prosthetics, kinesiology, sports medicine, and biomimetics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shepherd, R. F., Ilievski, F., Choi, W., Morin, S. A., Stokes, A. A., Mazzeo, A. D., Chen, X., Wang, M., & Whitesides, G. M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116564108 · Cited by 2,111
Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview
Bhushan, B. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0011 · Cited by 1,361
Cellulose Nanopaper Structures of High Toughness
Henriksson, M., Berglund, L. A., Isaksson, P., Lindström, T., & Nishino, T. (2008) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm800038n · Cited by 1,299
Biological materials: Functional adaptations and bioinspired designs
Chen, P.-Y., McKittrick, J., & Meyers, M. A. (2012) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.001 · Cited by 766
Robotic Tentacles with Three‐Dimensional Mobility Based on Flexible Elastomers
Martinez, R. V., Branch, J. L., Fish, C. R., Jin, L., Shepherd, R. F., Nunes, R. M. D., Suo, Z., & Whitesides, G. M. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201203002 · Cited by 718
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 41-4040-41-4040
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1532186756
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative biomechanics: life's physical world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-4040
- The paper
- Comparative biomechanics: life's physical world. (2004). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-4040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.