Cited by 160Leadership and Management in OrganizationsHistory, Medicine, and LeadershipPersonality Traits and Psychology

The Productive Narcissist. The Promise and Peril of Visionary Leadership.

·2004·Choice Reviews Online

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.41-5386

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having some concern for others may result in a search for alternative strategies (e.g., manipulate others, self-aggrandizement) to reach social goals.

    “Having some concern for others may result in a search for alternative strategies (e.g., manipulate others, self-aggrandizement) to reach social goals (55).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
41
Issue
09
Pages
41-5386-41-5386
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W644514844
Cited by
160
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History, Medicine, and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
visionary leadership, narcissism, leadership, organizational behavior, self-promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review